WK 10 Discussion SOCW 8205: Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer WK 10 Discussion SOCW 8205: Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer Cancer is often synonymous with

WK 10 Discussion SOCW 8205: Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer
WK 10 Discussion SOCW 8205: Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer
Cancer is often synonymous with fear, uncertainty, and death. A diagnosis of cancer begins a long journey that affects physical health, mental well-being, and relationships with loved ones. Although cancer care today often provides advanced medical treatment, psychosocial issues may not be adequately addressed (Artherholt & Fann, 2012). This failure may compromise the effectiveness of overall cancer management.
Oncology social workers play an integral role in cancer care in multiple settings. It is common for oncology social workers to engage in individual, family, and group intervention. In addition to providing direct patient care, oncology social workers provide valuable public health interventions, such as health education programs and policymaking.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review this weeks resources. Select one of the many different types of cancer and think about the overall impact of the disease. Consider the psychosocial effects of cancer. How might the cancer affect the health and well-being of an individual and caregivers?
Questions in bold then answers 300 to 500 words
Post an explanation of how this type of cancer might affect the health and well-being of the patient and caregivers.
Explain the psychosocial effects of the cancer on the patient and caregivers.
Explain how psychosocial factors might impact a treatment care plan and the management of the disease.
Finally, explain how you might address the psychosocial needs of a cancer patient and caregiver.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the resources and the current literature using appropriate APA format and style.
Resources
Beder, J. (2006). Hospital social work: The interface of medicine and caring. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chapter 8, Oncology Social Work with Adults (pp. 8194)
Gehlert, S., & Browne, T. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of health social work (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Chapter 19, Oncology Social Work (pp. 440-458)

An Uninvited Guest: Addressing Students Death
Anxiety in Oncology Social Work Field
Placements
Meuche, Glenn . Field Educator ; Boston Vol.7,Iss.1, (Spring 2017).

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
WK 10 Discussion SOCW 8205: Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer WK 10 Discussion SOCW 8205: Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer Cancer is often synonymous with
From as Little as $13/Page

ProQuest document link

ABSTRACT (ENGLISH)
Field placements present a wide breadth of challenges that afford students fertile ground to refine their clinical

skills of active listening, engagement, and relationship. The inclusion of a curriculum that encourages self-

reflection and centers on students attitudes and beliefs surrounding end-of-life care has a positive influence and

direct correlation to their comfort level and openness to speaking with their clients about death and dying. The

supervisory relationship has been heralded as the cornerstone in the development of effective clinicians and as

the quintessential learning experience for the clinician, the foundation of students educational growth and

development, and the therapeutic alliance in which supervisees develop their own style. (Sormanti, 1994, p. 75)

Death anxiety and unfamiliarity with regard to skills that are solicited in oncology social work and end-of-life care

may account for students difficulty in recognizing the clinical dimension of these field placements. The clinical

skills employed in oncology social work placements are unique and often different from interventions used for

instance, in mental health venues. Students discover themselves struggling with the clinical skills of the capacity

to sit with the silence and offer the gift of presence in end-of-life care. Curricula that include discussions about

the psychology of illness, including defenses and their usefulness in helping people adapt to the many anxieties

raised by severe and life-threatening illnesses, would prepare students better for oncology placements (Sormanti,

1994, p. 84). Bridging the academic component with the affective dimension of social work practice is integral to

the development of clinical acuity…

FULL TEXT
Social work student internships are an indispensable ingredient in the formation of students professional identity.

Field placements present a wide breadth of challenges that afford students fertile ground to refine their clinical

skills of active listening, engagement, and relationship. The issues that are addressed by students specializing in

psychosocial oncology and end-of-life care are unique. Students in these field placements are not only confronted

by their clients dying and death, but forced simultaneously to reconcile themselves to their own mortality as well.

Why, you may ask, take on this unpleasant, frightening subject? Why stare into the sun? Why grapple with the most

terrible, the darkest and most unchangeable aspect of life? [] Death [] is always with us, scratching at some

inner door, whirring softly, barely audibly, just under the membrane of consciousness. (Yalom, 2008, p. 9)

Death is an inescapable mortal wound that everyone experiences. Engaging with those who are dying is not an

isolated event, but instead, a collective experience. Dying is a relational event, and the clinician cannot be neutral,

absent, or objective (Berzoff, 2008, p. 182). The realization of death can become a wellspring, therefore, for

opportunity and growth. Its inevitability provides the impetus for us to engage with others in personal and intimate

ways.

Although the universality of death has the potential to connect human beings to one another on a deeper level, it

can lend itself to an existential crisis and heightened experience of death anxiety. Anxiety surrounding death

references the perceived amount of emotional distress provoked by the anticipated total nonexistence of the self

(Hui, Bond, &Ng, 2007, p. 200). Fear of death repeatedly is the pink elephant in the room. Its presence is palpable

https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com%2Fdocview%2F1924522581%3Faccountid%3D14872

https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com%2Fdocview%2F1924522581%3Faccountid%3D14872

and yet it often remains unspoken. Death anxiety can range from a fear of ego-dissolution and annihilation to fear

of the dead. It may reveal itself in anxiety over the process of dying and fear of the unknown. Field instructors can

help students embrace these fears, reframe them, and understand how death anxiety can enhance the therapeutic

relationship and their capacity to share in the suffering of the other.

Clinically, the experience of death anxiety may contribute to students difficulty in establishing alliances and

facilitating rapport with their clients. The fear of death for instance, can manifest itself in students reticence in

initiating dialogue with their clients and sharing in meaningful conversation pertinent to death and dying. Students

may attempt to change the subject because of concern over upsetting their clients or engage in positive thinking

or reframing of their clients experience. In its worse scenario, death anxiety may translate to an avoidance of the

person who is at the end-of-life.

Professionals in end-of-life care have directed their attention to social work education and criticized the absence of

adequate training at times within the arena of death, dying, and loss. Social work educators and clinicians have

repeatedly pointed out the need for social work curricula to place more emphasis on social workers attitudes

toward death, dying and bereavement (McClatchey &King, 2015, p. 347). The inclusion of a curriculum that

encourages self-reflection and centers on students attitudes and beliefs surrounding end-of-life care has a

positive influence and direct correlation to their comfort level and openness to speaking with their clients about

death and dying.

The importance of death education to impart content knowledge about the death process and gaining insight into

the death attitudes of helping professionals has been emphasized by students, practitioners, educators, and

ethicists. It is clear there is a near universal agreement on the need for the inclusion of death education in the

training of helping professionals. (McClatchey &King, 2015, p. 346)

Therefore, it is critical that field placements situate emphasis on the experiential as well as the academic and

clinical component. Supervisors can encourage introspection and help student interns begin the process of

examining their insecurities and vulnerabilities pertaining to death, dying, and loss. This, however, would also

require field instructors to exhibit a willingness to recognize and connect with their own death anxiety and the

manner in which this impacts and directs their clinical work. Students not only model the clinical skills we impart

to them, but also with their clients they mirror the supervisory experience.

The supervisory relationship has been heralded as the cornerstone in the development of effective clinicians and

as the quintessential learning experience for the clinician, the foundation of students educational growth and

development, and the therapeutic alliance in which supervisees develop their own style. (Sormanti, 1994, p. 75)

Death anxiety and unfamiliarity with regard to skills that are solicited in oncology social work and end-of-life care

may account for students difficulty in recognizing the clinical dimension of these field placements. Students

sometimes expressed concern that an oncology setting is not clinical enough and that they feel they cannot apply

what they are learning in social work classes to their fieldwork (Sormanti, 1994, p. 80). The clinical skills employed

in oncology social work placements are unique and often different from interventions used for instance, in mental

health venues. Students describe clinical work as treatments with patients who can be labeled with a []

diagnosis and as work that can be done in an office setting in 50-minute hours under a mutually agreed-on client-

worker contract (Sormanti, 1994, p. 80). Students discover themselves struggling with the clinical skills of the

capacity to sit with the silence and offer the gift of presence in end-of-life care. Many students are uncomfortable

with emotionality, in part related to their own histories, but also because they may not know how to sit with it or

what to do with it professionally (Urdang, 2010, p. 531). Students discomfort with these skills may preclude their

ability to establish and foster therapeutic relationships with those who are dying. Beginning where the person is

entails the recognition of the innateness of suffering in the human condition and readiness, therefore, to begin

where death and dying are. Being present means tolerating ones own anxiety about death in order to be able to

help clients and families to tolerate their own (Berzoff, 2008, p.179).

The following excerpt illustrates the discomfort that students experience. S was a student intern working with a

woman whose husband was diagnosed with stage IV metastatic pancreatic cancer. Her husbands prognosis was

poor and although death was present, it nonetheless remained the pink elephant as the student was reticent in

opening the door. In addition to feeling confused and frightened by the prospect of her husbands dying and death,

Ss client also articulated struggling with anger over which she subsequently experienced guilt.

Student: I see. Its good that youre reaching out to us. Were here to listen. So I understand that hes receiving

treatment for his pneumonia? How did that go?

Client: Hes doing well. Hes already back at home. Next month Im going to meet with the oncologist. They said he

still has a 4mm tumor left. They shrank it down from 6mm. Theyre talking about putting him on additional

chemotherapy to shrink the rest. He may even undergo a clinical trial. But my husband, he doesnt want to. He said

his body is not able to handle it right now. And I dont blame him. I wont force him to go back. But Im sure he will

change his mind once he talks to the doctor.

Student: Chemo must have been rough for him.

Client: Yeah it was. You know, he lost all of his hair. When it first started, he would just put his hand through his

hair and a bunch of hair could come out. He decided to shave it all off. Now he wants to wear hats. I always joke

with him and use humor to keep me positive.

Student: Thats admirable. Using humor is a very creative and effective way to cope. Im glad youre able to stay

positive through all this.

Client: But, you know, I also get angry over all this as well. It just isnt fair what is happening to him. And then I feel

guilty for feeling this way. Its hard sometimes.

Student: I understand that you and your husband moved recently?

Client: Yeah, I mean our families are here so there are always people checking in on us.

Student: Im glad to hear that you have supportive people around you to help you cope with your husbands

diagnosis.

Client: I wont give up. I always know that God is out there looking out for me and my mother in heaven is looking

down on me.

In reflecting upon what transpired in the session, S was uncertain as to whether or not attention should center on

anticipatory loss or, instead, the clients anger and guilt. The student writes, It seems like the client wanted a place

to vent her worries that she cannot share with her husband. She mentioned feeling angry and that this might

perhaps be a goal for her to work on. I did not dwell on it further as our time was up and I was not sure if the anger

has anything to do with the cancer. However, this is a topic that can be clarified and possibly pursued if it

surrounds her husbands cancer. Maybe I should go over goal setting with her instead of letting her vent? Even

though her initial request for counseling was simply to have someone to talk to how do I shape this into a more

structured and organized discussion?

The establishment of the therapeutic relationship is an integral aspect of oncology social work and end-of-life care.

Students discover themselves struggling at times with use of self and what they should disclose and reveal to

clients within the session. Many students, for instance, who herald from mental health settings, are dissuaded

from engaging in self-disclosure.

Several supervisors shared stories about students who were afraid to acknowledge that they used interventions

such as physical contact and sharing of personal information, which the supervisors believed was appropriate to

use, but students were discouraged from doing so in class. (Sormanti, 1994, p. 80)

Field instructors can respond to students concerns by helping them feel more comfortable with the clinical skills

that are encompassed in their work with the dying. Helping students develop the art of presence and encouraging

deep listening will enable them to interact with their clients in rich and profoundly empathic ways. In attempting to

transcend narratives that have been solely reduced to clinical technique, Frank (1998) suggests that:

The deeply ill person is the immediately needy one, and this persons story deserves primary attention. Clinicians

may share parts of their own stories, but they do so in response to the ill persons story. Reciprocity is sustained in

the appreciation with which the clinician receives the patients stories. To give the gift of listening is to appreciate

receiving the gift of a story. Not just understanding this reciprocity but embracing it seems to me to be the

beginning of clinical work. (p. 200)

Oncology social work and end-of-life care are emotionally laden field placements and students may feel

overwhelmed and stressed by continually witnessing their clients suffering. The intensity and range of emotions

that are articulated by clients can instill feelings of impotency in students. Field instructors have indicated an array

of challenges oncology social work presents to students and have underscored several factors that can contribute

to the complexity of supervising interns in these settings. The most notable influences on students are:

[] constant confrontation with loss, dying, and death; exposure to physical mutilation and pain; negotiation

between social worker and clients of intense affective responses over a long period; immediate and strong

countertransference reactions; helplessness and frustration at ultimately being unable to save patients; and use of

a less restricted, unconventional set of boundaries. (Sormanti, 1994, p. 78)

Students may discover they are unprepared for this work and field placements sometimes lack the support that is

necessary to assuage the risk of vicarious trauma and compassion fatigue. Supervision, therefore, becomes more

complicated and field instructors may assume greater responsibility with regards to addressing their students

needs.

Encouraging self-reflection among students can prove beneficial in promoting professional growth and

competency. The creation of a secure environment where students are able to engage in introspection is

paramount to developing insight into their beliefs and values surrounding death, dying, and end-of-life care.

Students need educational support and direction to deepen their capacity to develop a professional self, including

an ability to recognize, understand, and utilize their feelings and insights on behalf of their clients (Urdang, 2010,

p. 532). Working in oncology social work can become a potential battleground. A venue where students can

process the clinical work and address countertransference may help to mitigate the risk for burnout.

CancerCares student internship program acknowledges the significance of individual supervision and student

peer support groups as crucial in strengthening students resilience and enabling them to address the needs and

concerns of their clients who are living with cancer or may be at the end-of-life. Social work professionals have

emphasized the role of intersubjectivity in the therapeutic relationship, especially as it pertains to transference and

countertransference. Urdang (2010) has issued a call for process oriented clinical work and states that:

Students need to understand the interactional nature of work with clients, how to process this internally, and, when

appropriate, directly with clients; they first must learn how to process basic interview crunches before they can

move on to more intense crunches [] from clients. (p. 532)

Utilizing process recordings, for instance, not only serves as a vital tool in promoting self-reflection but elucidates

conscious as well as unconscious interpersonal dynamics between the student and client.

Recognizing the importance of death education in abating the impact of death anxiety, CancerCare has

established Lets Talk about Death round-table discussions.

Helping those coping with death, dying, and bereavement can provoke confusing and frightening existential

questions and painful feelings of personal loss. Coming to terms with death involves both internal and

interpersonal processes that are influenced by individual and societal death attitudes. These attitudes profoundly

influence how one copes with death on an up close and personal level as well as an abstract and complex

concept. (McClatchey &King, 2015, p. 345)

In these discussions, students are afforded an opportunity to share and process feelings and fears they may

harbor surrounding death and dying. In addition, CancerCare offers a variety of in-service programs that are

designed to expand students comprehension of cancer, treatment, and loss. Curricula that include discussions

about the psychology of illness, including defenses and their usefulness in helping people adapt to the many

anxieties raised by severe and life-threatening illnesses, would prepare students better for oncology placements

(Sormanti, 1994, p. 84). Bridging the academic component with the affective dimension of social work practice is

integral to the development of clinical acuity in oncology social work and end-of-life care. It is imperative that

[students] are not only knowledgeable about the dying process but also feel a certain comfort level working with

this population and have increased insight into their personal attitudes and feelings about death, dying, and

bereavement (McClatchey &King, 2015, p. 358).

Although death is an uninvited guest and is often depicted metaphorically as the Grim Reaper, it also has the

potential of opening doors to greater interiority and increasing the depth of human relationships. R, a second-year

student in CancerCares internship program, reflects:

The internship definitely guided me to raising self-awareness and comfort when having the conversation of death

and dying with others. There seemed to have been emphasis on meeting the clients where they are in their journey

– which I think is unique as CancerCare encourages this. I felt that the topic of death is very abstract and looking

back at my experience, CancerCare seems to be open-minded and supportive in this area.

Students working in oncology social work field placements may find their clinical skills challenged by death

anxiety. Supportive field instructors who are sensitive to the impact of death anxiety on students can help

ameliorate their fear of dying. Students will then become empowered and can begin the process of embracing the

challenge in order to enhance their connection to clients who may be at the end-of-life.

References

Berzoff, J. (2008). Working at the end of life: Providing clinically based psychosocial care. Clinical Social Work

Journal, 36(2), 177-184. doi:10.1007/s10615-007-0119-z

Frank, A. W. (1998). Just listening: Narrative and deep illness. Families, Systems &Health, 16(3), 197-212.

doi:10.1037/h0089849

Hui, V. K., Bond, M. H., &Ng, T. S. W. (2007). General beliefs about the world as defense mechanisms against death

anxiety. OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying, 54(3), 199-214. doi:10.2190/8NQ6-1420-4347-H1G1

McClatchey, I. S., &King, S. (2015). The impact of death education on fear of death and death anxiety among

human services students. OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying, 71(4), 343-361. doi:10.1177/0030222815572606

Sormanti, M. (1994). Fieldwork instruction in oncology social work: Supervisory issues. Journal of Psychosocial

Oncology, 12(3), 73-87. doi:10.1300/J077V12N03_05

Urdang, E. (2010). Awareness of self-A critical tool. Social Work Education, 29(5), 523-538. doi:

10.1080/02615470903164950

Yalom, I. D. (2008). Staring at the sun: Overcoming the terror of death. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

DETAILS

Subject: Internships; Students; Fear &phobias; Curricula; Palliative care; Anxieties; Oncology;

Social work; Professionals; Attitudes; Education; Learning; Field study; Death &dying

Publication title: Field Educator; Boston

Volume: 7

Issue: 1

Publication year: 2017

Publication date: Spring 2017

Publisher: Simmons College

Place of publication: Boston

Country of publication: United States, Boston

LINKS
Linking Service

Database copyright 2020 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest

Publication subject: Education

e-ISSN: 21653038

Source type: Scholarly Journals

Language of publication: English

Document type: Journal Article

ProQuest document ID: 1924522581

Document URL: https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com%2

Fdocview%2F1924522581%3Faccountid%3D14872

Copyright: Copyright Simmons College Spring 2017

Last updated: 2017-07-31

Database: ProQuest Central

http://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ:education&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=Field%20Educator&rft.atitle=An%20Uninvited%20Guest:%20Addressing%20Students’%20Death%20Anxiety%20in%20Oncology%20Social%20Work%20Field%20Placements&rft.au=Meuche,%20Glenn&rft.aulast=Meuche&rft.aufirst=Glenn&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=Field%20Educator&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/

https://search.proquest.com/info/termsAndConditions

http://about.proquest.com/go/pqissupportcontact

An Uninvited Guest: Addressing Students Death Anxiety in Oncology Social Work Field Placements d
l
n
i
Oncology Social Work in

Palliative Care
W
ith regard to cancer, two facts are clear: cancer is the second
leading cause of death in the USA,1 and the consequences of
unmet psychosocial needs for those with terminal cancer have

evastating consequences for quality of life experienced.2 The medical
iterature on this topic recognizes the importance of addressing these
eeds and recommends that the education and training for oncologists
nclude skills necessary for assessing and handling psychosocial issues.3-5

This body of literature, however, does not address the importance of
oncologists understanding the role of the oncology social worker, whose
training and experience is focused exclusively on insuring that the psycho-
social needs of individuals diagnosed with cancer are addressed. The
oncology social worker is an important resource for oncologists, whose time
allotted to patients is often focused out of necessity on medical issues and
less on psychosocial needs. As the number of palliative care teams
continues to grow, oncologists and oncology social workers will increas-
ingly find themselves working together. If the team is to address
holistically the needs of individuals with cancer, capitalizing on the social
workers expertise and skills will be crucial.

This article seeks to heighten the awareness and understanding of
oncology social work, as well as the contribution this profession can make
to oncologists and other members of the palliative care team. First, the
reported psychosocial needs of cancer patients and their families are
discussed. Next, the skills, knowledge, and theoretical approaches a social
worker uses to meet those needs are detailed. Finally, the relationship
between oncology social workers and the oncologists with whom they
work daily is addressed. It is hoped that the information provided in this
article will result in an increased recognition of what oncology social
work has to offer individuals grappling with the devastating effects of
cancer, and to the oncologists who work to provide these individuals with

quality care.

Curr Probl Cancer 2011;35:357-364.
0147-0272/$34.00 0
doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2011.10.010

Curr Probl Cancer, November/December 2011 357

P
T

d
O
p
f
i

p
i
s
l
m
a
d
r
i
s
s
s
o
o

n
t
l
c
i
e
c
e
i
p
p
w
s
i
p
a

3
sychosocial Needs of Patients Diagnosed with
erminal Cancer
Much has been written about the psychosocial needs of individuals
iagnosed with terminal diseases, many of whom had a cancer diagnosis.
ne line of research that has contributed a great deal of insight into the
sychosocial needs of individuals at the end of life is the study of the
actors that motivate individuals diagnosed with cancer and other terminal
llnesses to consider a hastened death.
Research has been conducted both retrospectively with health care
rofessionals and family members and prospectively with terminally ill
ndividuals. In regard to the retrospective reporting, individuals who
ought a hastened death were motivated by psychosocial factors, such as
ack of enjoyment in life,6 loss of control,6,7 fear of future pain,6,8 loss of
eaning in life,9 feelings of being a burden,6,9 and loss of dignity6,9 and

utonomy.6 Prospectively, terminally ill individuals, many of whom were
iagnosed with cancer, reported the same psychosocial factors as those
eported retrospectively, as well as others. In regard to social support,
ndividuals reported having few social supports,10,11 a lower quality of
ocial support,10,12,13 conflictual social support,11 low satisfaction with
ocial support,14 and a lack of social support.15 In addition to social
upport needs, individuals also reported anxiety,12 depression,12,13 a lack
f enjoyment in life, feelings of being a burden and useless,16 and a lack
f control.16

Studies focused solely on cancer patients have also found psychosocial
eeds to be prevalent. In a large study of oncologists, 72% reported that
heir patients experienced psychosocial distress over issues that included
ogistics, coping with their illness and treatment, and addressing the
oncerns of their partner and children.17 In a qualitative study, researchers
nterviewed young adults diagnosed with cancer, who reported experi-
nces with emotional distress and a lack of social support.18 Researchers
onducted a review of studies on depression and cancer and discovered
vidence that depression can make coping with cancer more difficult, and
t can negatively affect immune functions.19 A major study of 4500
atients diagnosed with cancer found that 35% reported experiencing
sychological distress, and this distress was greatest for respondents
hose cancer had a poor prognosis.20 In another study, fatigue, a key

ymptom of cancer, was found to be correlated with depression.21 Finally,
n a systematic review of 94 studies conducted on the prevalence of unmet
sychosocial needs, such needs were determined to be present both during

nd after cancer treatment.22

58 Curr Probl Cancer, November/December 2011

T

f
j
q
i
o
i
i
p
r
s
f
e
a
d
h
s

u
a
i
C
s
d
r
a
c
k

O

h
T
p
i

e
t
e

C
ypes and Times
In studies of individuals diagnosed with cancer, evidence has been

ound concerning the psychosocial distress associated with a particular
uncture in the cancer journey or with a particular type of cancer. In a
ualitative study of 96 terminally ill elders, 15 reported 4 critical events
n their dying process that resulted in psychosocial suffering: two-thirds
f these individuals were diagnosed with cancer.23 These 4 events
ncluded being given a terminal diagnosis in what was perceived of as an
nsensitive and uncaring manner; suffering unbearable and untreated
hysical pain; not addressing the feelings individuals had about having to
eceive chemotherapy or radiation treatment; and receiving care in a
tressful environment. Concerning types of cancer, researchers have
ound that persons with lung cancer had a significantly high risk of
xperiencing psychosocial problems, such as depression and anxiety,
fter both diagnosis and treatment.24 Forty-seven percent of 236 newly
iagnosed breast cancer patients were determined to have experienced
igh levels of distress resulting from worry, nervousness, and depres-
ion.25

Knowledge of the types of psychosocial issues experienced by individ-
als diagnosed with cancer, as well as particular times of vulnerability
nd cancers that may put people at higher risk of psychological distress,
s key to determining how best to intervene and address such issues.
onsistently, authors of these studies point out the need for psychological

creening and early intervention,16,20,25 particularly at the time of
iagnosis.24 Researchers also agree on the need for more research to
efine current assessment procedures and develop interventions that
ddress more effectively emotional distress in individuals diagnosed with
ancer. Both assessment of psychosocial issues and intervention are the
ey areas of expertise possessed by trained oncology social workers.

ncology Social Work
The main providers of psychosocial services in cancer centers and
ealth care settings in the community are oncology social workers.26

hese professionals possess significant knowledge of cancer, the resulting
sychosocial issues, and the intervention strategies for addressing such
ssues.
The training and skills provided to social workers through their graduate

ducation makes them uniquely suited to work with cancer patients. First,
he social work profession is distinctive in its use of a person-in-

nvironment approach, which takes note of the reciprocal relationship

urr Probl Cancer, November/December 2011 359

b
i
i
m
r
f
a
r
o
p
a
i
h

s
b
a
d
t
l
i
c
e

s
a
p
e
i
a
s
p
f

s
w
v
p
w
m
m

3
etween the person and his or her environment, and how he or she is
nfluenced by interactions with the environment. Social workers view
ndividuals as being dynamically involved with systems in the environ-
ent that include family, friends, work, social service organizations,

eligions, health care, educational, government, and culture, to name a
ew. The person in his or her environment is a whole in which the person
nd the situation are both cause

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *