Title
Running Head: COMMUNICATION PLAN 1
COMMUNICATION PLAN 2
Communication Plan
Student name
Professor
Course
Date of submission
A communication plan is every critical element in an organization. Its part of the systemic planning in an organization and must therefore be put in great consideration. In the context of this question, communication plans a tool that is lined with the organizational goal and objectives. In this case, a communication plan is a defined tool that helps share communication and effective delivery of information to all the involved stakeholders. The plan identifies messages and channels used to desire their message (Pylat, 2017). On the same note, the information should be secured from any form of compromise that can expose it to unwanted hands. In the project communication plan, I would include professional based approaches to sure continuity and professionalism in the entire scope. Importantly, the objectives should cover the diver organization and bring about advanced scopes of communication that are most effective. Some of the objectives that I would include in the plan include and not limited to:
One of the key objectives includes Attaining a sustainable and competitive based process when sharing organizational based information to involved stakeholders. Ideally, the mode of sharing information and strategic development scope should not be in line with organizational goals and doctrine.
The mode of communication should be secured and must not be exposed to a third party. Information sharing in the organization should be secured to prevent threats, hacking, and alternation, changing the coded meaning (Hielkema, 2018).
The process should also be very fast, effective, and efficient. In this case, the organization will have a quick delivery of the communication process. All the involved personnel, in this case, will have timely access. This will help the organization when responding to emergency cases and matters that require timely delivery.
Promote excellence in inclusion and diversity communication in the organization is also another objective based organizational factor. Ideally, the human resource is improved in planning and quality constraint concept in the organization. Communication plans, in this case, will be very critical in addressing the human resource phase.
Teamwork and work design processes will raise the measure of effectiveness and indulgence on matters regarding the execution of duties. Therefore, the metric of the plan should help in accomplishing the organization’s systemic goal through vision enhancements and objective communication processes Adelle, 2019).
Other critical objectives to put into consideration include the adoption of electronic-based communication, achievement sustainable roadmap scope, and more so customer based resolution objectives, which will increase the rate of work and communication in general (Rad & Ardeshir, 2015).
References
Adelle. (2019). Strategic planning: Goals and objectives. Retrieved from https://leoisaac.s446.sureserver.com/planning/strat027.htm
Hielkema,L.M. (2018).Financial strategic project management SPOMP: Five powerful new strategies for implementing change. LMHCpub.
Pylat,N. (2017). Competencies and educational objectives in HR management education: The Ukrainian case study. doi:10.15405/epsbs.2017.05.02.106
Rad,I.Z., & Ardeshir,A. (2015). the approach towards urban drainage development prioritization and project definition structure.Journal of Hydroinformatics,17(6), 959-976. doi:10.2166/hydro.2015.134 Running Head: FEDERAL AND STATES SYSTEM 1
FEDERAL AND STATES SYSTEM 2
Federal and States System
Student name
Professor
Course
Date of submission
Introduction overview
The united states have adopted two forms of governance in running and managing the country. The federal government and state-level governance modes play different roles as part of the country’s strategic development and running. According to the “comparatives law,” an American outlines that the two models are established through management’s fundamental principles and laws. The mode of governance is well outlined and dictated in the Constitution. Both of them are acknowledged and play a critical role in governance. In his case, the government has been able to manage the population. On the same note, the united states have adopted a democratic mode of governance where they exercise the people’s rule for the people by the people (Bancel, 2016). The leaders on both legal systems represent the people and are elected following a majority rule. For leaders to sit in the executive chair in both houses, one must ascertain the office’s dignity and be elected by the people following a transparent and fair election process. The mode of the legal system has promoted binding between the two governments. Infrastructure and articulation of the Constitution have played a key role in giving the guideline and road map to be followed by the two legal systems.
Federal system
The federal legal system is defending in the U.S. Constitution since its founding document and the land’s supreme law. The legal system adopted in this case is mainly uneasy because of the balance between the national government and the diverse fifty states managed by the state government. In this regard, they are parallel systems that carry down executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, and shared powers among the states and the federal governments. The affiliation between the two systems can be quite complex. Its diverse because of the nature of roles and obligations outlined in the Constitution. Simply put, the supremacies of the federal system of governance are specifically defined in the Constitution. Those commands are limited to a particular prearrange within the fifty sovereign states (Canadian Centre for Management Development, 2018).
In this case, federal law makes rules and regulations that are applied in managing the whole county. There have been fewer disputes between the two system elements since the two houses in us have provided the advanced infrastructure through clauses. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution has played a key role in powering effective law’s enactment and furtherance compliance through review processes. On the same note, federal laws have legal superiority over a state constitution or law that governs the states. The law and policy developed to have the characteristic of managing the whole country (Chard, 2018).
Ideally, it has the check and balance scope, which gives the supremacy power. One of the important characters associated with the federal system is proposed legislation in the chamber. Congress, therefore, makes bills, joint resolution, and content resolutions that run the country. The threshold scope given in this case is covered diverse exercise of law across the country. The law formed affects the country’s running and may opt to make some resolution that affects the states. Law that affects the states’ general running made by the federal state should always be passed following the directives and consultation of the senate (Stephan, 2014). The federal system’s main role is extending a legislative scope, executive scope, and more ensuing effective running of the judicial processes; the three branches must effectively work together at the prices of attaining successful managing of the country.
States system
The state system is made of 50 states that are runners by the elected governor. It plays the role of the local government. This form of the legal system is only responsible for making rules and regulations that can be used in those particular states. For instance, the law made in California cannot be applied in Alabama. Every state has its Constitution, and the provision made is only subject to people living in the particular county’s jurisdiction. Every state has its senator who represents its interest in the senate. Some of the responsibility delegated to the states government includes schools and health issues. Every state is responsible for establishing infrastructure in the hospital. It maintains relations and systemic development of the states through project and policy development.
Other role includes emergency services such as fire alongside other catastrophic disasters. They get their funds from taxes and funds that are realized by the federated government. U.S. states policy and equalization find are other key sources that find this form of governance. Leaders such as alexander hamilton, madison, George Washington, alongside others, advocated form this form of the legal system. They wanted to allow tyranny and increase participation in the political arena. It was also a tool that would be used to bring serves closer to the public.
Similarities and differences in federal and state legal system
In the similarities context, the two systems are established in strict adherence to the Constitution. The power of the two units of governance is established to enhance services to the community. All the postings in both legal systems are elective positions, and one is given the leadership mantle through a majority share of the vote. Both of them have a critical role in enhancing judicial fairness and equity. In this regard, both have a court system that listens gives ruling on different filed (Stephan, 2019).
Nevertheless, the states are governed using the state statues while and federate the federal statutes manage the government. The statutes are developed following the application context. Besides that, the states get their fund from taxes and share issued by the federal government. In the court system, the federate law covers both states and federal governments, while states will use state jurisdiction court to make its determination. The federal legal system has power over the state, and formulated laws are extended to all states accords the board. The supreme administration control, in this case, is the must-have a subsequent ideal notion that safeguards the principles and doctrines of the law. The completeness of the two legal systems is enshrined in strict adherence to the Constitution, the rule of law, and the social policy (Chard, 2018).
References
Bancel. (2016). State & local government. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/state-local-government/
Canadian Centre for Management Development. (2018).Protecting Canadian Democracy: The Senate you never knew. McGill-Queen’s Press – MQUP.
Chard. (2018). A guide to the U. S. Federal legal system web-based public accessible sources – GlobaLex. Retrieved from https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/United_States.html
Stephan,P.B. (2014). Introduction.Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System, 1-9. doi:10.1163/9789004278929_002
Stephan,P.B. (2019).Foreign court judgments and the United States legal system. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
