The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker
In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.
To Prepare:
Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.
Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.
The Assignment:
Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.
Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues responses.
PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:
1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM
2). 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS
3). PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED: RUBRIC.
Thank you so much
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name:NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Points:
Points Range:
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.
Includes: 1 or fewer resources.
Feedback:
Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.
Points:
Points Range:
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing.
Feedback:
Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.
Points:
Points Range:
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many ( 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many ( 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.
Good
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.
Fair
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.
Poor
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.
Includes: 1 or fewer resources.
Feedback:
Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
Good
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
Fair
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.
Poor
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing.
Feedback:
Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.
Good
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.
Fair
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate.
Poor
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Poor
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many ( 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many ( 5) APA format errors. Feedback: Total Points: 100 Name:NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
