Proficiency Level Analysis- Please pay close attention to directions and the rubric. I’m looking for 100%
Proficiency Level Analysis
Analyze the proficiency level data in the Ms. Jensens 7th Grade Class AZELLA Scores document to place the students into appropriate groups for in-class activities.
In a 500-750 word essay, describe how you would group these students for in-class English language arts activities. Also, include a rationale of at least 200 words for your choices. This means that the word count will be increased to 700-950 words. Include the names of the students in their respective groups.
I have attached the template version of Ms Jensens 7th Grade Class AZELLA Scores so that you can move the students around and add the essay and rationale at the bottom. Create a different chart to group students and include the essay and rationale with that
Support this assignment with at 4 scholarly resources no later than the year 2010.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ESL-533 ESL-533-O501 Proficiency Level Analysis 75.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Category 100.0%
Grouping for In-class English Language Arts Activities 40.0% Not addressed. The description of the grouping strategy for the students on the class list is not presented clearly or the grouping strategy is inadequate for in-class English language arts activities. The description of the grouping strategy for the students on the class list could be presented more clearly or the grouping strategy could be more adequate for in-class English language arts activities. Includes a description of a grouping strategy for the students on the class list that would be adequate for in-class English language arts activities. Includes a well-informed description of a grouping strategy for the students on the class list that would be ideally suited for in-class English language arts activities.
Rationale 40.0% Not addressed. The rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities is not presented well. The rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities could be more fully developed. Includes rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities. Includes an insightful rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities.
Organization 5.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
APA Format and Style Requirements 5.0% Not addressed. References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used. References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.
Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100% Ms. Jensen’s 7th Grade Class AZELLA Scores
Student Name
Reading Label
Writing Label
Listening Label
Speaking Label
Aryanna
Proficient
Intermediate
Intermediate
Proficient
Carlos
Intermediate
Basic
Basic
Intermediate
Corynn
Basic
Basic
Emergent
Basic
Desiree
Basic
Intermediate
Basic
Intermediate
Gabriel
Proficient
Intermediate
Intermediate
Proficient
Hailey
Basic
Emergent
Emergent
Basic
Jade
Basic
Basic
Intermediate
Intermediate
Jakob
Intermediate
Basic
Intermediate
Intermediate
Jerry
Intermediate
Intermediate
Intermediate
Intermediate
Michael
Intermediate
Proficient
Intermediate
Proficient
Noah
Basic
Intermediate
Intermediate
Intermediate
Petie
Proficient
Intermediate
Intermediate
Intermediate
Ramon
Emergent
Emergent
Pre-Emergent
Emergent
Rebecca
Basic
Emergent
Basic
Basic
Suzanne
Proficient
intermediate
Intermediate
Proficient
2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
