Please see attachment. For the Week 6 Project Paper Draft assignment, you will submit a complete report as the draft paper

Please see attachment.

For the
Week 6 Project Paper Draft assignment, you will
submit a complete report as the draft paper. Make any necessary revisions based upon feedback from your instructor. Now that you have completed your research, you will need to
write the Executive Summary. This section will provide a summary of your report and should be no more than one page.
In addition, your draft must include any appendixes (i.e survey tools, interview questions, raw data results, etc. as needed.) You must also provide your complete References section using APA format.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Please see attachment. For the Week 6 Project Paper Draft assignment, you will submit a complete report as the draft paper
From as Little as $13/Page

Note: Draft versions
MUST be complete.

Please ensure that your work includes the following requirements;
an analysis of the background, current state, and future state of the topic that evaluates ethical, legal, financial, and economic considerations within the research process.
applies critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills in collecting, evaluating, and analyzing data and information relating to the research topic
applies healthcare management concepts (planning, organizing, leading, and controlling) in developing and presenting viable, effective, and acceptable conclusions/recommendations relating to the topic.

Note: The executive summary is its own section on the draft.

Feedback( The title page information should be separate from the discussion. The title of the paper should be bold on the title page. A table of contents is needed with all the sections of the paper. The reference page title should be in bold text.)

PREVIOUS PAPERS below

Challenges to EHR Adoption and Usage, as well as Its Impact on Patient Care

Institution Name
Students Name
Course Name
Instructors Name
Date

Electronic health records (EHRs) have come a long way in the last 25 years, but there are still barriers to their widespread adoption and benefits are sometimes less than anticipated. As a result of technological advancements and the lobbying of the Institute of Medicine in the US, a movement towards replacing paper health records with electronic records began in the early 1990s.
The healthcare sector has slowly come to recognize the shortcomings of paper-based patient records over the last 25 years, and as a consequence, electronic records have been steadily created and envisioned with numerous anticipated advantages. The deployment, acceptance, and usage of EHRs have come a long way in the roughly 25 years since its inception. Regrettably, this has been done more in a disorganized fashion than a methodical one.
While modern EHRs still do not fulfil the demands of today’s fast evolving healthcare environment, many of the original hopes for saving time, increasing productivity, and bettering the quality of treatment have either not been achieved or have only been accomplished in part. It was anticipated that widespread use of EHRs would eliminate data duplication, however this problem persists still. Legislative protections for patients’ right to privacy and confidentiality in the context of electronic health record (EHR) data have only lately made substantial headway.

References
Atasoy, H., Greenwood, B. N., & McCullough, J. S. (2019). The digitization of patient care: a review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annual review of public health, 40, 487-500.
Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2022). The impact of health information and communication technology on clinical quality, productivity, and workers. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 23-46.
Lin, Y. K., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306-318.
Rasmi, M., Alazzam, M. B., Alsmadi, M. K., Almarashdeh, I. A., Alkhasawneh, R. A., & Alsmadi, S. (2020). Healthcare professionals acceptance Electronic Health Records system: Critical literature review (Jordan case study). International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(sup1), 48-60.
Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life, 10(12
), 327.

Previous paper 2

Challenges to EHR Adoption and Usage, as well as Its Impact on Patient Care

Institution Name
Students Name
Course Name
Instructors Name
Date

TABLE OF CONTENT
Introduction3
Problem statement.3
Research Objectives..3
Purpose statement.4
Research questions…4
Background..4
Significance of the problem.4
Literature review.4
Data sources and methods of collection..

Definitions of key terms.

Report organization.

Introduction:
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have revolutionized the healthcare industry by providing a centralized and efficient platform for patient information management. However, despite their potential benefits, the adoption and usage of EHRs face numerous challenges that hinder their full realization. This report will explore the challenges to EHR adoption and usage and their impact on patient care, while also providing recommendations for addressing these challenges.
Problem Statement:
Despite the potential benefits of EHRs, their adoption and usage have been slow and uneven, with some healthcare providers still relying on paper-based records. The challenges to EHR adoption and usage have resulted in significant inefficiencies, errors, and costs, negatively impacting patient care (Lin et al., 2019).
Research Objectives:
The objectives of this research are to:
Identify the challenges to EHR adoption and usage.
Evaluate the impact of these challenges on patient care.
Develop recommendations for addressing these challenges.
Purpose Statement:
The purpose of this research is to identify the challenges to EHR adoption and usage and their impact on patient care, and to develop recommendations for addressing these challenges.
Research Questions:
What are the challenges to EHR adoption and usage?
How do these challenges impact patient care?
What recommendations can be made to address these challenges?
Background:
EHRs are digital versions of patient medical records that include information on a patient’s medical history, medications, allergies, and diagnostic test results. EHRs have the potential to improve patient care by providing healthcare providers with timely and accurate information about patients. However, despite their potential benefits, the adoption and usage of EHRs have been slow and uneven, with some healthcare providers still relying on paper-based records.
Significance of the Problem:
The challenges to EHR adoption and usage have significant implications for patient care, including inefficiencies, errors, and costs. These challenges can result in delayed or incorrect diagnoses, medication errors, and reduced patient satisfaction (Bronsoler et al., 2019).
Literature Review:
The literature on EHR adoption and usage identifies several challenges, including financial costs, technical difficulties, and usability issues. Studies have also shown that EHR usage can have both positive and negative impacts on patient care (Atasoy et al., 2019). Positive impacts include improved patient safety and quality of care, while negative impacts include increased workloads for healthcare providers and reduced face-to-face interactions with patients.
Data Sources and Methods of Collection:
Data for this report was collected from a variety of sources, including peer-reviewed articles, government reports, and industry publications. The data was analyzed using qualitative research methods, including content analysis and thematic analysis.
Definitions of Key Terms:
Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Digital versions of patient medical records that include information on a patient’s medical history, medications, allergies, and diagnostic test results.
Healthcare Provider: A person or organization that provides medical care to patients.
Patient Care: The provision of medical care to patients.
Report Organization:
This report will be organized into three main sections. The first section will explore the challenges to EHR adoption and usage. The second section will evaluate the impact of these challenges on patient care. The final section will provide recommendations for addressing these challenges.
An analysis of the background, current state, and future state of the topic must evaluate ethical, legal, financial, and economic considerations within the research process. From an ethical perspective, the adoption and usage of EHRs raise concerns about patient privacy and confidentiality (Ashawan & Sagar, 2020). The use of EHRs requires strict adherence to data protection laws and regulations to ensure patient data is not exposed to unauthorized access or misuse.
From a legal perspective, the use of EHRs is governed by laws and regulations that vary by country and region. For example, in the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulates the use of EHRs and mandates the protection of patient data. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in significant financial penalties. From a financial and economic perspective, the adoption and usage of EHRs require significant investments in infrastructure, software, and training (Rasmi et al., 2020). The benefits of EHRs are often long-term and may not be realized immediately, making it difficult for healthcare organizations to justify the initial costs.
To effectively address the challenges to EHR adoption and usage, critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills must be applied in collecting, evaluating, and analyzing data and information relating to the research topic (Tsai et al., 2020). Healthcare management concepts such as planning, organizing, leading, and controlling must also be applied in developing and presenting viable, effective, and acceptable conclusions and recommendations relating to the topic.
In conclusion, this report will provide a comprehensive analysis of the challenges to EHR adoption and usage and their impact on patient care, while also exploring potential solutions for addressing these challenges.

References
Ashawan, S., & Sagar, R. (2020). Uses of computer applications for patient care delivery and nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 8(4), 543-553. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijner&volume=8&issue=4&article=029
Atasoy, H., Greenwood, B. N., & McCullough, J. S. (2019). The digitization of patient care: a review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annual review of public health, 40, 487-500. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044206
Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2022). The impact of health information and communication technology on clinical quality, productivity, and workers. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 23-46. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-101909
Lin, Y. K., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306-318. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.2018.0813
Rasmi, M., Alazzam, M. B., Alsmadi, M. K., Almarashdeh, I. A., Alkhasawneh, R. A., & Alsmadi, S. (2020). Healthcare professionals acceptance Electronic Health Records system: Critical literature review (Jordan case study). International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(sup1), 48-60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20479700.2017.1420609
Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life, 10(12), 327. https://www.mdpi.com/913530

PREVIOUS PAPER 3

Preliminary Research Draft

Student Name

Institution Affiliation

Preliminary Research Draft

Background

The collection and presentation of data are essential components of any research project. This study collected data from various sources, including peer-reviewed articles, government reports, and industry publications. Using multiple sources ensured that the data collected was diverse, reliable, and comprehensive (Ashawan & Sagar, 2020). Content analysis and thematic analysis were used on the data to conduct a thorough investigation of the application of HER in healthcare facilities These methods helped identify trends, patterns, and key themes relevant to the research question.
As the data was collected, it was essential to present the results in the appropriate format. This included using tables, charts, graphs, and other visuals to help illustrate the findings. By presenting the data visually appealingly, it was easier to understand and interpret the results. Additionally, the raw data was submitted for review, allowing any necessary revisions based on instructor feedback (Ashawan & Sagar, 2020). This process ensured that the results were accurate and reliable.
The ability to critically evaluate the topic’s history, present, and potential future was essential to the success of this effort. Ethical, legal, financial, and economic factors had to be considered throughout the research process. The data collected allowed for a thorough examination of these factors, and the analysis presented in the report reflected this. By considering these factors, the conclusions and recommendations presented in the report were viable, effective, and acceptable.

Critical Thinking

In collecting and analyzing data on the challenges to EHR introduction and application in healthcare facility and the effects it has on patient outcome. The appropriate format could be in a table, chart, graph, or any other format that adequately represents the data. Presenting the results in a suitable format makes it easier to analyze the data and draw meaningful conclusions. Additionally, including the raw data for review allows for transparency and credibility in the research process (Ashawan & Sagar, 2020). It also allows the instructor to provide feedback and suggestions for any revisions needed to improve the research.
It is essential to approach the data collected objectively and analyze it using a qualitative research method such as content analysis or thematic analysis (Bronsoler et al., 2021). This approach helps in identifying patterns, themes, and trends that may exist within the data. By applying critical thinking and problem-solving skills, it is possible to identify potential challenges in adopting and using EHR and understand their impact on patient care (Atasoy et al., 2019).
However, to ensure that the work meets the assessment requirements, the data sources and collection methods should be clearly stated in the research report. The information used in the paper came from a wide range of places, such as scholarly articles, government documents, and trade journals. These sources provide credible and reliable data that can be analyzed using qualitative research methods (Ashawan & Sagar, 2020). Providing the data sources and methods of the collection also helps in verifying the credibility of the research and ensuring that the data analyzed is relevant to the research topic.

Management

In collecting data for the research topic “Challenges to EHR Adoption and Usage, as well as Its Impact on Patient Care,” it is important to present the results in the appropriate format, such as tables, charts, and graphs. These visual aids provide a clearer understanding of the data and can help in identifying patterns and trends. Moreover, submitting the raw data for review allows for any revisions to be made based on the instructor’s feedback, ensuring the accuracy and validity of the data presented.
Planning, organizing, directing, and controlling are just few of the healthcare management concepts that must be applied as data is gathered. The process of planning entails the establishment of aims and the development of means for their attainment (Atasoy et al., 2019). Organizing refers to the arrangement of resources and activities needed to achieve objectives. Leading entails guiding and motivating individuals or teams to achieve the goals, while controlling involves monitoring and adjusting activities to ensure they align with the objectives. By applying these concepts, viable, effective, and acceptable conclusions and recommendations can be developed and presented.
Peer-reviewed journals, government studies, and industry publications were also used in the data collection process (Ashawan & Sagar, 2020) to learn more about the barriers to and benefits of using electronic health records (EHRs) in patient care. Data analysis was performed using qualitative techniques such as content analysis and thematic analysis. These techniques provide a thorough comprehension of the problems and their effects on patient care, which is essential for coming up with workable remedies.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of collecting and presenting data in an appropriate format and using qualitative research methods to analyze it. Applying critical thinking and healthcare management concepts such as planning, organizing, leading, and controlling is crucial in the research process. By utilizing various sources of data and qualitative research methods, valuable insights can be gained on the problems to EHR acceptance and application and the influence it has on patient care. The findings of this study can help healthcare organizations and policymakers make informed decisions and develop effective solutions to improve EHR adoption and usage and enhance patient care outcomes.

References
Ashawan, S., & Sagar, R. (2020). Uses of computer applications for patient care delivery and nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 8(4), 543-553.
Atasoy, H., Greenwood, B. N., & McCullough, J. S. (2019). The digitization of patient care: a review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annual review of public health, 40, 487-500.
Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2022). The impact of health information and communication technology on clinical quality, productivity, and workers. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 23
-46.

FEEDBACK FROM INDTRUCTOR (The title page information should be separate from the discussion. The title of the paper should be bold on the title page. A table of contents is needed with all the sections of the paper. The reference page title should be in bold text.)

Previous paper 4

Research Draft

Student Name

Institution Affiliation

Research Draft

The research process normally consists of the following steps, each of which assesses moral, legal, economic, and financial variables in the context of the topic’s past, present, and potential future:

Finding a topic to study: Understanding the barriers to EHR adoption and utilization and how that affects patient care is the first step in any research project (Atasoy et al., 2018). Conducting a literature review: The next step is to conduct a thorough review of the literature on the topic, with a focus on identifying relevant research studies, reports, and other sources of information. This involves collecting and evaluating data and information from a variety of sources, including academic journals, books, government reports, and online databases.

Collecting data: Once the literature review is complete, the next step is to collect primary data through various research methods such as surveys, interviews, or focus groups (Lin et al., 2019). This data will be used to evaluate the current state of EHR adoption and usage and its impact on patient care (Rasmi et al., 2020).

Analyzing data: The data collected through primary and secondary sources must be analyzed using appropriate data analysis techniques (Atasoy et al., 2018). This step involves identifying patterns and trends in the data and drawing conclusions based on the findings.

Developing conclusions/recommendations: Based on the data analysis, viable, effective, and acceptable conclusions, and recommendations can be developed.

Evaluating ethical, legal, financial, and economic considerations: In addition to the above steps, it is crucial to evaluate the ethical, legal, financial, and economic considerations associated with the topic. This evaluation involves examining any ethical issues that may arise, legal and regulatory requirements that may need to be considered, financial and economic implications of the recommendations, and potential conflicts of interest.

Critical Thinking

thinking involves examining information and data from multiple perspectives, questioning assumptions, and evaluating evidence to form an objective opinion. In researching the challenges to EHR adoption and usage, critical thinking would be applied to analyze the various factors contributing to the challenges, such as the cost of implementation, technical difficulties, and resistance to change (Lin et al., 2019). Problem-solving skills involve identifying and analyzing a problem, identifying potential solutions, and selecting the best course of action (Bronsoler et al., 2022). In researching the impact of EHR adoption and usage on patient care, problem-solving skills would be applied to determine the specific problems caused by EHR systems and to develop potential solutions, such as improving user training or streamlining documentation processes.

Decision-making skills involve evaluating and selecting the best course of action based on available information and evidence. In researching the impact of EHR adoption and usage on patient care, decision-making skills would be applied to weigh various solutions’ potential benefits and drawbacks and select the best course of action (Bronsoler et al., 2022). Researchers examining barriers to EHR adoption and utilization and their effect on patient care must be able to think critically, solve problems, and make sound decisions. By applying these skills, researchers can collect, evaluate, and analyze data and information systematically and objectively, leading to viable and effective conclusions and recommendations.

Healthcare Management

It is vital to have an understanding of healthcare management principles like as planning, organizing, leading, and controlling to develop and provide results and suggestions that are practical, successful, and acceptable in relation to the topic of the difficulties associated with EHR adoption and usage, as well as the influence that it has on patient care. Planning involves identifying the key issues and setting objectives for addressing them (Bronsoler et al., 2022). Organizing requires creating a plan of action that outlines the steps to be taken to achieve the objectives. Leading involves managing stakeholders and ensuring that they are fully engaged in the process. Finally, controlling involves monitoring progress toward the objectives and making adjustments as necessary. By applying these concepts to the research process, it is possible to develop practical, achievable, and effective recommendations for improving the adoption and usage of EHRs while minimizing the negative impact on patient care.

References

Atasoy, H., Greenwood, B. N., & McCullough, J. S. (2019). The digitization of patient care: a review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annual review of public health, 40, 487-500.

Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2022). The impact of health information and communication technology on clinical quality, productivity, and workers. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 23-46.

Lin, Y. K., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306- 318.

Rasmi, M., Alazzam, M. B., Alsmadi, M. K., Almarashdeh, I. A., Alkhasawneh, R. A., & Alsmadi, S. (2020). Healthcare professionals acceptance Electronic Health Records system: Critical literature review (Jordan case study). International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(sup1), 48-60.

Prevoius paper 5

Analysis and Conclusions

Name

Institution

Course

Tutor

Date

The healthcare industry has rapidly evolved with technological advancements and the growing demand for personalized care. Electronic health record (EHR) systems, such as Wearable technology like fitness trackers and smartwatches, are one of the most recent trends in healthcare for monitoring and improving health outcomes. Wearable technology has the potential to change the way we think about healthcare by providing real-time data on a variety of health parameters (Bronsoler et al., 2022). Presently, the adoption of the EHR in healthcare facilities is promising. The technologies track and store various health parameters, including heart rate, sleep, steps, and activity levels. The use of electronic technologies makes it possible to have successful management of chronic diseases and monitor patients remotely.

Nevertheless, based on the outcome of the research investigations, the implementation of the EHR has not been fully realized in many hospitals. Financial costs, technical difficulties, usability issues, resistance to change, and a lack of interoperability were among the issues revealed by data collected from various sources (Rasmi et al., 2020). The initial investment and ongoing maintenance costs were significant barriers to EHR adoption. Adoption and use of EHRs were also hampered by technical issues such as poor internet connectivity and system downtime. For example, poor user interfaces and complex workflows made it difficult for healthcare providers to use EHRs effectively.

Ethical concerns also characterize the use of the EHR. These concerns are related to privacy and data security. The use of the EHR is sensitive, and there is a risk that this data will be misused or accessed by unauthorized individuals within the facilities. Consequently, it is critical to ensure adequate safeguards to protect the privacy and security of wearable data (Rasmi et al., 2020). The poor implementation of the safety measures is caused by the failure to adhere to the protection guidelines. Some employees might resist or ignore the guidelines regarding the operations of the EHR systems hence the risk of exposure of the patient health information to unauthorized persons. Various laws, including data protection laws and medical device regulations, govern the use of wearables in healthcare. Wearable device manufacturers and healthcare providers must ensure that these regulations are followed.

Based on the research outcomes, resistance to change is a barrier to the successful implementation of the EHR. Resistance to change is a significant barrier to EHR adoption and usage. Healthcare providers were frequently hesitant to abandon paper-based records, which they were accustomed to and had used for a long time (Lin et al., 2019). Another significant barrier to EHR adoption and usage was a lack of interoperability, or the inability of different EHR systems to communicate and share data.

According to the data, these challenges significantly impacted patient care. The difficulties resulted in inefficiencies, errors, and costs, which hurt patient care. For example, poor usability and complex workflows resulted in more time spent on documentation, resulting in fewer face-to-face interactions between healthcare providers and patients. Due to a lack of interoperability, patient data was incomplete, resulting in delayed or incorrect diagnoses and treatment.

The cost of implementing the EHR is an essential factor in healthcare. The purchase of the required materials for the installation of the EHR in healthcare facilities is costly. As a result, healthcare providers must weigh the financial implications and determine whether the benefits outweigh the costs (Lin et al., 2019). The implementation of the EHR allows for remote patient monitoring and a reduction of the long hours spent in the waiting bay for in-person consultations. Nevertheless, the adoption of EHR necessitates investment in infrastructure and training, which can be a barrier to entry.

According to cost/benefit estimates based on project findings, the initial investment and maintenance costs of EHR adoption are both high. However, in the long run, the long-term benefits of EHRs, such as improved patient safety and quality of care, reduced medication errors, and increased efficiency, outweigh the costs.

Conclusions

The EHR in healthcare has a bright future and is expected to become more sophisticated, monitoring a broader range of health parameters. They will also be integrated with healthcare systems, allowing real-time monitoring and personalized care. The following conclusions can be drawn from the data findings:

Financial costs, technical challenges, usability issues, resistance to change, and a lack of interoperability are all significant barriers to EHR adoption and usage.

EHR adoption and usage challenges significantly impact patient care, including inefficiencies, errors, and costs.

Despite the difficulties, the long-term benefits of EHRs, such as improved patient safety and quality of care, outweigh the costs.

Recommendations

The following recommendations are made based on the findings:

To encourage adoption and usage, healthcare organizations should invest in EHRs and ensure they are user-friendly, simple to use, and have a simple workflow.

Healthcare organizations should provide healthcare providers with training and support to help them transition from paper-based records to EHRs.

Healthcare organizations should promote the development and adoption of EHR interoperability standards to ensure patient data can be shared across systems.

In addition, healthcare organizations should conduct a cost-benefit analysis of EHR adoption and usage to assist decision-makers in weighing the benefits and costs of adopting EHRs.

References

Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2022). The impact of health information and communication technology on clinical quality, productivity, and workers. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 23-46.

Lin, Y. K., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect the quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306- 318.

Rasmi, M., Alazzam, M. B., Alsmadi, M. K., Almarashdeh, I. A., Alkhasawneh, R. A., & Alsmadi, S. (2020). Healthcare professionals acceptance Electronic Health Records system: Critical literature review (Jordan case study). International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(sup1), 48-60. Challenges to EHRs Adoption and Usage as well As Its Impact On Patient Care

Students Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name and Number
Instructors Name
Date

Challenges to EHRs Adoption and Usage As Well As Its Impact On patient care

Introduction

Electronic health records have transformed healthcare greatly. They have enabled healthcare professionals and patients to access and share information easily thus facilitating effective decision-making. Other benefits that the healthcare industry has experienced as a result of electronic health records include the reduction of medical errors which has been facilitated by the availability of patient records (Alanazi et al, 2020). However, there are notable barriers to the adoption and utilization of electronic health records which in turn affect patient care.

Literature review

Medical errors are a leading cause of death in healthcare and to reduce medical errors, there must be better ways to store and share patients’ medical information. Unlike paper records that can be illegible, and easily get lost or misplaced, electronic health records facilitate better collection, storage, and display of patient information. The Institute of Medicine has noted that adopting Electronic Health Records widely can help to positively transform healthcare (Alanazi et al., 2020).
According to Bersani et al. (2020), despite the benefits of Electronic Health Records usage in healthcare, the adoption rates of these systems are still low and there is a lot of resistance from physicians. Electronic health records act as an ess

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *