Organization Communication I need a report from 2000 words. All the information is the file. COURSE CODE BCO323 COURSE NAME Organizational Communica

Organization Communication
I need a report from 2000 words. All the information is the file.

COURSE CODE BCO323 COURSE NAME Organizational Communication Task brief & rubrics

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Organization Communication I need a report from 2000 words. All the information is the file. COURSE CODE BCO323 COURSE NAME Organizational Communica
From as Little as $13/Page

Task

Assignment W4: Elements of Effective Communication

Purpose of the Assignment:

The assignment is designed to provide learners the opportunity to demonstrate their ability to critically compare and contrast empathetic and critical listening, develop
guidelines for evaluating speakers message critically discuss the significance of non-verbal behaviour in a specific organization or career field and explore language
as a cause of miscommunication.

Individual Report

The Report contains parts A and B

Part A

Please critically compare and contrast empathic and critical listening. Please design a set of guidelines for evaluating speakers message but also note when it would
be fitting to withhold judgment.

Please give examples of four types of nonverbal behaviour and summarize the importance of each in a specific organization or career field.

Part B

Please explain why language is often a cause of miscommunication across cultures. What can international managers do to minimize communication problems that
stem from language difference?

Please provide examples of strategies to overcome common barriers to effective communication in the contemporary organisational context.

Deadline: Sunday 23 August, 23:59 CET

Word Limit: 2000

Both parts carry equal marks

Suitable Reference System: Harvard

Credit will be given for evidence of:

Library/Internet based research. Try to use a mixture of resources – books, articles as well as the internet.

Understanding of the issues raised by the questions.

Concise and clear presentation. Acknowledge any quotes, ideas or arguments that are not your own using the Harvard system. Include a list of references.

Originality and a critical and questioning approach. It is important to be objective and to support statements with evidence.

A logical structure and well-argued conclusion.

Good luck!

Formalities:

Word count: 2000

Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.

Font: Arial 12,5 pts.

Text alignment: Justified.

The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvards citation style.

Submission: Week (4) Via Moodle (Turnitin). Deadline: Sunday 23 August 2020 – 23:59 CET

Weight: This task is a 40% of your total grade for this subject.

Rubrics

Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge &
Understanding

(20%)

Student demonstrates
excellent understanding of
key concepts and uses
vocabulary in an entirely
appropriate manner.

Student demonstrates
good understanding of the
task and mentions some
relevant concepts and
demonstrates use of the
relevant vocabulary.

Student understands the
task and provides minimum
theory and/or some use of
vocabulary.

Student understands the task
and attempts to answer the
question but does not
mention key concepts or uses
minimum amount of relevant
vocabulary.

Application (30%) Student applies fully
relevant knowledge from
the Organizational
Communication topics
delivered in class.

Student applies mostly
relevant knowledge from
Organizational
Communication the topics
delivered in class.

Student applies some
relevant knowledge from
the Organizational
Communication topics
delivered in class.
Misunderstanding may be
evident.

Student applies little relevant
knowledge from
Organizational
Communication the topics
delivered in class.
Misunderstands are evident.

Critical Thinking
(30%)

Student critically assesses
in excellent ways, drawing
outstanding conclusions
from relevant authors.

Student critically assesses
in good ways, drawing
conclusions from relevant
authors and references.

Student provides some
insights but stays on the
surface of the topic.
References may not be
relevant.

Student makes little or none
critical thinking insights, does
not quote appropriate
authors, and does not
provide valid sources.

Communication
(20%)

Student communicates
their ideas extremely
clearly and concisely,
respecting word count,
grammar and spellcheck

Student communicates
their ideas clearly and
concisely, respecting word
count, grammar and
spellcheck

Student communicates
their ideas with some
clarity and concision. It
may be slightly over or
under the wordcount limit.
Some misspelling errors
may be evident.

Student communicates their
ideas in a somewhat unclear
and unconcise way. Does not
reach or does exceed
wordcount excessively and
misspelling errors are
evident.