Marketing Due in 36 hours. Three pages single spaced. No Plagiarism. I attached the chapter 4 Lecture. ExCh4 1. Interview a sales manager to unde

Marketing
Due in 36 hours. Three pages single spaced. No Plagiarism. I attached the chapter 4 Lecture.

ExCh4

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Marketing Due in 36 hours. Three pages single spaced. No Plagiarism. I attached the chapter 4 Lecture. ExCh4 1. Interview a sales manager to unde
From as Little as $13/Page

1. Interview a sales manager to understand the sales organizational design plan for the company or business unit for which he/she works. Address the following.
a. What is this managers name, job title, and company? Describe the industry? Who are this salesforces primary customers (e.g., manufacturers, retailers, businesses, consumers, etc.)
b. Describe the organizational design for the salesforce. Which of the designs we discussed in class (e.g., geographical, market, product, function, etc.) does this most closely align with? Justify your answer.
c. Why did the sales manager choose this particular sales organizational/territory design plan? According to this manager, what are the pros and cons of the design?

Notes: Be sure to incorporate topics, concepts, and terminologies discussed in the chapter.

2. Submit/post your word document to the Bb assignment folder space by the due date listed in the syllabus schedule. Note: Write-ups should be no more than 3 single spaced pages.

Grading Rubric to be used

Criteria

Points

Answers cover all parts/aspects of the questions, are in-depth, incorporates concepts from the course material, and contain proper spelling and grammar.

27-30

Answers cover some but not all parts/aspects of the questions, are somewhat in-depth, may lack adequate incorporation of concepts from the course material, and contain some spelling and grammar errors.

24-26

Answers cover only a few parts/aspects of the questions, are lacking depth, are void of concepts from the course material, and contain many spelling and grammar errors.

0-25

Late submission of work

50% deduction from earned score Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

1

Learning Objectives
Define the concepts of specialization, centralization, span of control versus management levels, and line versus staff positions.
Describe the ways salesforces might be specialized.
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of sales organization structures.
Name the important considerations in organizing strategic account management programs.
Explain how to determine the appropriate sales organization structure for a given selling situation.

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

2

Learning Objectives
Discuss salesforce deployment.
Explain three analytical approaches for determining allocation of selling effort.
Describe three methods for calculating sales force size.
Explain the importance of sales territories and list the steps in the territory design process.
Discuss the important people considerations in salesforce deployment.

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

3

Sales Organization Concepts

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

4

3

Specialization

Centralization

The degree to which individuals perform some of the required tasks to the exclusion of others.

The degree two which important decisions and tasks performed at higher levels in the management hierarchy.

Individuals can become experts on certain tasks, leading to better performance for the entire organization.

Centralized structures place authority and responsibility at higher management levels.

Sales Force Specialization Continuum

Some specialization
of selling activities,
products, and/or
customers

All selling activities
and all products to
all customers
Generalists
Certain selling activities for certain products for certain customers
Specialists

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

5

2

Flat Sales Organization

Span of Control
Management Levels
National Sales Manager
District Sales Manager
District Sales Manager
District Sales Manager
District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

Span of Control vs. Management Levels

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

6

Tall Sales Organization

National Sales Manager

Span of Control
Management Levels

District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager
District Sales Manager
District Sales Manager
District Sales Manager

District Sales Manager

Regional Sales Manager

Regional Sales Manager

Span of Control vs. Management Levels

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

7

National Sales Manager

Regional Sales Managers

District Sales Managers

Sales Training Manager

Sales Training Manager

Salespeople

Staff Position
Line Position
Line vs. Staff Positions

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

8

4

Selling-Situation Factors and
Organizational Structure

Organizational
Structure Environmental
Characteristics Task
Performance Performance
Objective

Specialization High Environmental Uncertainty Nonroutine Adaptiveness

Centralization Low Environmental
Uncertainty Repetitive Effectiveness

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

9

5

Customer and Product Determinants
of Sales Force Specialization
Customer Needs Different
Customer Needs Similar
Simple Product Offering
Complex Range of Products

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

10

5

Geographic Sales Organization

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

11

Product Sales Organization

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

12

Market Sales Organization

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

13

Functional Sales Organization

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

14

Large
Small
Complexity of Account

Size of Account
Large
Account
Simple
Complex
Strategic
Account
Regular
Account
Complex
Account
Identifying Strategic Accounts

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

15

Strategic Accounts Options

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

16

Comparison of
Sales Organization Structures

Organizational
Structure Advantages Disadvantages

Geographic Low Cost
No geographic duplication
No customer duplication
Fewer management levels Limited specialization
Lack of management control over product or customer emphasis

Product Salespeople become experts in product attributes & applications
Management control over selling effort High cost
Geographic duplication
Customer duplication

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

17

7

Comparison of
Sales Organization Structures

Organizational
Structure Advantages Disadvantages

Market Salespeople develop better understanding of unique customer needs
Management control over selling allocated to different markets High cost
Geographic duplication

Functional Efficiency in performing selling activities Geographic duplication
Customer duplication
Need for coordination

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

18

7

Hybrid Sales Organization Structure

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

19

Salesforce Deployment
Salesforce deployment decisions can be viewed as providing answers to three interrelated questions.

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

20

3

Interrelatedness of
Salesforce Deployment Decisions
How much selling effort is needed to cover accounts and prospects adequately so that sales and profit objectives will be achieved?
How many salespeople are required to provide the desired amount of selling effort?
How should territories be designed to ensure proper coverage of accounts and to provide each salesperson with a reasonable opportunity for success?
Allocation of
Selling Effort

Salesforce
Size

Territory
Design

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

21

4

Interrelatedness of
Salesforce Deployment Decisions
2,000 accounts x 25 sales calls/account = 50,000 sales calls required to cover accounts
50,000 sales calls required 1,250 sales calls/ salesperson = 40 salespeople needed
40 territories needed to provide each salesperson with opportunity for success and to ensure proper coverage of accounts (e.g. 50 accounts per territory)
Allocation of
Selling Effort

Salesforce
Size

Territory
Design

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

22

4

Analytical Approaches to
Allocation of Selling Effort

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

23

Single Factor Models
Easy to develop and use; low analytical rigor

Accounts classified into categories based on one factor, such as market potential

All accounts in the same category are assigned the same number of sales calls

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

24

5

Single Factor Model Example

Market Potential
Categories Average Sales Calls to
an Account Last Year Average Sales Calls to
an Account Next Year

A 25 32

B 23 24

C 20 16

D 16 8

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

25

6

Portfolio Models
Account Opportunity – an accounts need for and ability to purchase the firms products

Competitive Position – the strength of the relationship between the firm and an account

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

26

6

Portfolio Model Segments and Strategies

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

27

6

Decision Models
Simple Basic Concept – to allocate sales calls to accounts that promise the highest sales return from the sales calls

Optimal number of calls in terms of sales or profit maximization

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

28

6

Sales Force Size: Key Considerations
Sales Productivity
Ration of Outputs to Inputs
Sales Growth as a Result of Adding Salespeople is Curvilinear
Diminishing Marginal Returns
Salesforce Turnover
Usually Very Costly
Should be Anticipated and Managed
Organizational Strategy
Growth Targets
Selling Costs
Market Share

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

29

15

Salesforce Size Decisions

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

30

Analytical Tools: Breakdown Approach
Uses sales forecast to determine salesforce size
Easy to use and understand
Conceptually weak – assumes sales drives the need for salespeople
Best suited in stable selling environments
Salesforce size = Forecasted sales / Average sales per sales person

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

31

16

Analytical Tools: Workload Approach
Estimation of selling effort needed is used to determine salesforce size
Estimating selling effort needed may be simple or complex
Conceptually sound

Number of salespeople =
Total selling effort needed

Average selling effort per salesperson

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

32

16

Analytical Tools: Incremental Approach
Uses Marginal Profit Contribution and Marginal Costs to Determine Salesforce Size
Quantifies Important Relationships Between Salesforce Size, Sales, and Costs,
Most Rigorous Method and Difficult to Develop
Not appropriate for New Salesforces

# of Salespeople
Marginal Contribution
Marginal Cost
100
101
102
103
$85,000
$80,000
$75,000
$70,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

33

16

Salesforce Size: Other Considerations
Turnover
Salesforce Size Calculations Should Incorporate Turnover Rates
Example: Desired Size is 100; Annual Turnover is 20%; Recruiting, Selecting, and Training Should be Based on Salesforce Size of 120.
Outsourcing the Salesforce
Need salesforce quickly and/or for short period
Flexible
Contractual arrangements vary

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

34

Calculating Turnover
For any given time frame (e.g., month quarter, year), divide the number of salespeople leaving their jobs (e.g., terminated, quit, promoted) by the total number of salespeople employed at the mid-point of the time frame.

Example: Time Frame 1 Year
Separations 50 Salespeople
# of Salespeople at Mid-Point 200
Salesforce Turnover = 25%

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

35

Designing Territories
Territories consist of whatever specific accounts are assigned to a specific salesperson. The territory can be viewed as the work unit for a salesperson.

Territory Considerations
Trading areas
Present effort
Recommended effort

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

36

19

Territory Design Procedure

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

37

20

Territory Design: Using Technology
Software Optimizes Territory Design Using Multiple User-Defined Criteria
Compare Multiple Methods Quickly and Easily
Examples

Sales Territory
Configurator

Tactician

TerrAlign

Alignstar

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

38

People Considerations
Analytical models dont account for people considerations
Individual differences in buyers and accounts
Salesperson intuition
Sales managers should temper the analytical results with people considerations before making final deployment decisions.

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

39

Developing Forecasts

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

40

Why Forecast?
Determining Sales Force Size
Designing Territories
Establishing Sales Quotas and Selling Budgets
Determining Sales Compensation Levels
Evaluating Salesperson Performance
Evaluating Prospective Accounts

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

41

Types of Forecasts
Market Potential
Sales Potential
Market Potential
Sales Potential
Industry Level
Firm Level
Best
Possible Results
Expected Results
for Given Strategy

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

42

Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Forecasting

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

43

Bottom Up

Top Down

Forecast made at the front-line level and then aggregated up the levels of the organization

Forecast made at the business unit level then broken down by zone, region, district, territory, and account forecast.

Top-Down Approach

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

44

Bottom-Up Approach

Company Sales Forecast
Combined into district, region,
and zone forecasts
Combined into territory forecasts
Salespersons forecasts
of accounts

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

45

Company Forecasting Methods
Moving Averages
Uses historical averages to forecast future sales
Averages are calculated using a predetermined number of previous periods (e.g., two-year moving average; four-year moving average)
Exponential Smoothing
Weighted moving average
Usually most recent period is weighted heavier
Decomposition Methods
Breakdown historical sales data into four components (trend, cycle, seasonal, erratic)
Evaluate the components and then reincorporate to create forecast

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

46

Moving Averages Forecast Example

Year Actual Sales Two-Year Four-Year

2002 $8,400,000

2003 $8,820,000

2004 $8,644,000 $8,610,000

2005 $8,212,000 $8,732,000

2006 $8,622,000 $8,428,000 $8,520,000

2007 $9,484,000 $8,418,000 $8,574,000

2008 $9,674,000 $9,054,000 $8,740,000

2009 $10,060,000 $9,579,000 $8,998,000

2010 ? $9,868,000 $9,460,000

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

47

Exponential Smoothing Forecast Example

Year Actual Sales = 0.2 = 0.5 = 0.8

2002 $8,400,000

2003 $8,820,000 $8,400,000 $8,400,000 $8,400,000

2004 $8,644,000 $8,484,000 $861,000 $8,736,000

2005 $8,212,000 $8,516,000 $8,627,000 $8,662,000

2006 $8,622,000 $8,455,000 $8,420,000 $8,302,000

2007 $9,484,000 $8,488,000 $8,521,000 $8,558,000

2008 $9,674,000 $8,687,000 $9,003,000 $9,299,000

2009 $10,060,000 $8,884,000 $9,339,000 $9,599,000

2010 ? $9,119,000 $9,700,000 $9,968,000

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

48

Moving Averages Forecast Example

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

49

Actual Sales 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8400000 8820000 8644000 8212000 8622000 9484000 9674000 10060000 Two-Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8610000 8732000 8428000 8417000 9053000 9579000 9867000 Four-Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8989500 8574500 8740500 8998000 9460000 Exp. Smoothing 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8400000 8736000 8662000 8302000 8558000 9299000 9599000 9968000

Breakdown Methods
Use factors influencing sales at the region, district, and territory levels to adjust forecasts made at the business unit level (top-down method).
Buying Power Index (BPI) is often
used to adjust forecasts.
Factors should be continuously
evaluated.

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

50

Even Allocation vs. Breakdown Methods

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

51

Company Sales Forecast = $1,000,000

Region A Portion= .33

Forecast = $333,333

Region B Portion = .33

Forecast = $333,333

Region C Portion = .34

Forecast = $333,334

Company Sales Forecast = $1,000,000

Region A Breakdown Factor = .20

Forecast = $200,000

Region B Breakdown Factor = .30

Forecast = $300,000

Region C Breakdown Factor = .50

Forecast = $500,000

Bottom-Up Approach Methods
Survey buyer intentions
Survey buyers purchasing intentions
Aggregate
Jury of executive opinion
Executives or other experts estimate sales at the account level
Estimates are averaged or otherwise agreed upon to generate forecast
Delphi (A form of jury of executive opinion)
jury is anonymous and estimates are redistributed for revision
jury review and revise estimates until consensus is reached
Sales force composite
Salespeople create forecasts for the accounts and territories
Forecasts are aggregated

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

52

Forecasting with Regression Analysis
Statistical technique using predictor variables (factors) to forecast sales
May be complex
Requires collection of
predictor variable data
Analysis may be
linear or logarithmic

Chapter 4:
Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment
Ingram
LaForge
Avila
Schwepker Jr.
Williams
Sales Management:
Analysis and Decision Making

53