Interest Group Presention
Interest Group Presentation
Requirements
You have been given the opportunity to present your case to an influential interest group in your community. You will use information gathered in each of the previous assignments to create a compelling presentation with the goal of persuading the interest group that your position on the policy is worthy of being implemented.
Create a 68-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you:
Provide a historical perspective of the policy from the Week 3 assignment, Historical Perspective.
Describe the official and unofficial actors of the policy from the Week 6 assignment, Analyzing Policy.
Present both of the positions of the policy from the Week 8 assignment, Position Paper.
Persuade the audience that the position you have chosen is worthy of the policy being implemented.
Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than five years old) from material outside the textbook.Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other websites ending in anything other than .gov do not qualify as peer-reviewed. Use Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library to identify references.
Your assignment must include:
Title slide with the name of the policy, your name, and date.
Reference slide with at least four peer-reviewed references formatted according to the Strayer Writing Standards.
68 slides (the title slide and reference slide are not included in this number).
A typed narration of each of your slides in the Notes section of the PowerPoint presentation.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Defend positions (for and against) on policy issues using various argument types.
By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.
Institution Release Statement
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION
Create Submission in BlackboardStart Submission
Attach Files
SafeAssign accepts files in .doc, .docx, .docm, .ppt, .pptx, .odt, .txt, .rtf, .pdf, and .html file formats only. Files of any other format will not be checked through SafeAssign.
ADD COMMENTS
Comments Character count: 0
When finished, make sure to click Submit.
Optionally, click Save as Draft to save changes and continue working later, or click Cancel to quit without saving changes.
Running Head: Position Paper 2
Position Paper 2
Position Paper
Kaila Grant
PAD 500
Professor Smith
August 31, 2020
Position for economic policy
Economic strategy is a share of the more prominent domestic policy in a state. Through both governments, Reagan’s and Obama’s economic plans were a vital part of the contest counter to recession in their periods. Economic goals set strategies on the performances of markets and the monetary segments. In realism, the so-termed economic rule is a collective of numerous sub-rules. They are intended to ensure that the needs of the nation are even. Sound economic strategies apply to a state irrespective of the financial atmosphere. Yet, they are mainly significant when the country hits a disaster. They aid offer courses and bid a means of tracing actions. These strategies are continually growing, as well. (Reagan & Frost, 2012).
An instance is once the Bush management dedicated about 700 billion U.S dollars for American economy stabilization. It is a move that shows the highly adjustable nature of the economic strategy. To get Congress to support the cash issue, the president should have a feasible and confirmed economic plan. The plan is fundamentally the ground for enquiring for assistance. This flexibility feature affirms that the tactics are important to the retrieval of the country. The strategies are as such a vital instrument in the stalling of increase. They aid to stall the rise and warrant a quick recovery for the economy. Prominently, they offer a historical foundation for evaluating the feasibility of philosophies. As such, the strategies are dynamic in reducing contrary possessions of the markets that might happen. (Obama & US, 2011).
The strategies must be in place. They are crucial platforms for solidity and sustainability. Their flexibility aids them in being able to address the public sector, the private segment, and the real estate sector. These plans are vital shields contrary to the foul up and fall of the economy like inflation, misery, and recession.
Position against the policy
The economic strategy seeks to prosper the private part and diminish government role in the markets. It purposes to liberate the markets as much as virtually possible from the law viewpoint. Yet, such strategies have been glared upon in some scholars. Such plans tend to offer for means to assist once the market goes rogue. An instance is the 700 billion U.S dollars that Congress devoted to the market stabilization. (Bearce, 2009) The similar is factual for the Affordable Care Act. It likewise binds resources to the health care segments and insurance part that aid lessens the grief of the typical American resident. At the very least, these plans hinder the standard supply, forces of markets, and demand. They purpose to level things in the face of adversity rather than let the usual market forces take the course. It is owing to this very basis that they are seen as partial on numerous stages. It could look unfair to help improve corporations that are going under while the ones that stay solid are left to fend for themselves. One and all of these firms are taxpayers. As such, using taxpayer cash to lessen their misery is perceived as unfair by numerous scholars. Taxpayer cash must be put in into plans that help everybody, not one large market player like General Motors. It is terrible on multiple points. (Bearce, 2009)
Most prominently, this aid through strategies outcomes in the propagation of some weak firms. Businesses that find it hard to go over the recession must be left to perish out. They will be fast traded by young, energetic firms that deliver the products. It is mostly terrible once you reflect that the medium and small-scale firms are frequently left to fend for themselves. They are not ever sure a straight dose, and as such, hundreds of like businesses go out of a commercial.
Response to the argument in favor of the policy
The domestic policy and mostly the financial feature of it must be able to guard ordinary Americans against the severe impacts of a rogue market. A rascal market here is a market that has harshly turned contrary to the customers. It may be over recessions and simple inflations. Logically, domestic strategies must be able to stop such a hostile situation in the first place. The plan intends to prevent such adverse activities. The exact detail that the opposing happening occurs is a sign that the policies have failed. The procedures do have an adaptive nature. It is for this foundation that they must be able to deal with developing matters. They have been honed over the years and like conditions. As such, they should be able to prevent financial calamity before it occurs. It is the best method of protecting everyday citizens. He should not be a theme to the punitive situations. From this viewpoint, the strategies must not be boasting of how they achieve inflation once it occurs. (Bearce, 2009).
They preferably should be boasting of how they have successfully achieved to predict pending inflation and prevent it. Yet, the strategies are essential, particularly in cases of disasters like worldwide tragedies. In this situation, the plan should be able to comprise the effects of the catastrophe fast before they finish into severe depression or inflation. The policies must be able to offer a whole method for refreshing every firm target. If they pick not to do so, then every firm must be abandoned to its fate. The rules must, at the very least, be.
Response to the argument against the policy
There are numerous kinds of market formations. They are; the composite, perfect competition, the monopoly, and the oligopoly. They are virtually model and theoretic. It is mainly correct for perfect competition, the oligopoly, and the monopoly market structures; they are mostly theoretic and do not almost exist. The real-world market structure amid these structures is the composite market formations. It is typical of what occurs in reality. It implies that the markets are in a category by a mixture of systems from the many market structures. Some of the designs, in their perfect state, do not deliver for government participation. Yet, the various market does recognize government participation and some other outside issues other than supply and demand forces. One such problem is government participation. Governments tend to get tangled as supervisors. They do it over plans. (Marshall, 2012).
The government pursues to control the market place; it guards the weak and restricts the powers of the strong over the weak. It is apparent over laws protecting infant businesses, antitrust and anti-opposition rules. These interferences have had constructive effects like the removal of cartels and the guard of customers. Due to the nature of the current culture, supply and demand forces can be distressing once left unchecked. It could be identical to the rules of the jungle. The population could be in exploitation, and the businesses could most likely conspire to get wealthier. Inflation could set in and become uncontainable. The best entrepreneurs would not care for the population, and as such, they would be undisturbed about the inflation as long as they got their part of the cash. Nevertheless, they could be in the care of modifying their charges.
References
Reagan, R., & Frost, D. B. (2012). Ronald Reagan in Quotations: A topical dictionary, with sources, of the presidential years. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland & Co.
Obama, B., & United States. (2011). President Obama presents the American jobs act (enhanced version). Washington, DC: White House.
Bearce, David. (2009). Monetary Divergence: Domestic Policy Autonomy in the Post-Bretton Woods Era. University of Michigan Press.
Marshall, A. (2012). The stunning design of market economies. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press.
