Export Target Market Report Prepare a professional report that empirically identifies the best market for marketing. Prepare the report as if you wer

Export Target Market Report
Prepare a professional report that empirically identifies the best market for marketing. Prepare the report as if you were a highly paid professional consultant using your own company logo. Follow the template provided.
1.Select a product for export
2.Conduct a data-driven market potential analysis to identify the top three export markets
1. Use Gazelle/USITC Database or other valid data sources
2. Use a Decision matrix
4.Recommend one international market for an export marketing plan
A typical report is less than 10 pages. Be concise. You select the type of decision matrix you want to use.
I have attached a template to use along with samples as well. Please use the below outline 1-5 to discuss in the report. Using Gazelle.ai is a plus if possible.

Insulin consumption per capita
Population
GDP per capita (or healthcare spending per capita to be more targeted)
Total US exports 2937.12.00
US export growth 2937.12.00

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Export Target Market Report Prepare a professional report that empirically identifies the best market for marketing. Prepare the report as if you wer
From as Little as $13/Page

EXPORT TARGET MARKET REPORT

Company
Logo

Prepared By:

First Last, Title

First Last, Title

Date
Add your consulting firms logo here

Executive Summary

An executive summary is a concise description of what the report contains. Pull important points from the body of the report and put them into the executive summary. Include the major findings, analysis and conclusions. A good executive summary allows the reader to understand the basic content of the report without reading the report. 150 to 250 words. This must include the recommended top market and a brief summary of why it is the best market.

Introduction

Purpose

The purpose of this report is to identify the top country markets for export. Identifying, assessing and choosing the right foreign markets to pursue makes export success more likely. Narrowing down possible export markets to three countries will allow a more focused export strategy.

Background

Describe your client company here in a short paragraph

Method of investigation

This study uses a decision matrix methodology with data from Gazelle.AI, IBISWorld, and USITC Trade Dataweb. A decision matrix evaluates and prioritizes a list of options (i.e., possible export markets) and is a decision-making tool. The team first establishes a list of weighted criteria and then evaluates each option against those criteria.

Scope

This research considers all 195 countries in the world in order to select the top three export market potential countries. The report identifies the top three markets with export market potential and further market analysis is needed to determine whether this potential can be actualized. The examination of the top market and market entry strategy will follow in the Export Marketing Plan report.

Market Potential Analysis

Criteria #1
Name:
Data Source:
Weight:
Justification:

Criteria #2
Name:
Data Source:
Weight:
Justification:

Criteria #3
Name:
Data Source:
Weight:
Justification:

Criteria #4
Name:
Data Source:
Weight:
Justification:

Criteria #5
Name:
Data Source:
Weight:
Justification:

Table X. Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Exports Markets for Product X

Criteria

Weight

Country 1

Country 2

Country 3

Country 4

Country 5

Country 6

Country 7

Weighted Score

Sources:

Top Export Potential Markets

1. Country X
2. County Y
3. Country Z

Discussion/Conclusions

One of the key aspects of a business report conclusion is summarizing the information for your reader. Your summary should mirror your opening or executive summary, recapping highlights that lead to a conclusion. After youve summarized the contents, its important that you provide an action plan or recommendation based on the information in the report. This doesnt have to be super specific, but it should give the reader a general overview of your assessments about the report, and some of the steps necessary to accomplish a task, fix a problem or implement a solution.

References

Appendixes

2

1

EXPORT TARGET MARKET
REPORT

Company

Logo

Prepared By:

First Last, Title

First Last, Title

D
ATE

A
DD YOUR CONSULTING FIRM

S LOGO
HERE

1

EXPORT TARGET MARKET
REPORT

Company
Logo

Prepared By:

First Last, Title
First Last, Title

DATE
ADD YOUR CONSULTING FIRMS LOGO
HERE 2.1 Matrix Potential for Beer Exports

Country

Total US exports y. 2019 (in million dollars)

Weight (25%)

GDP per capita (in thousands$)

Weight (20%)

Beer Consumption per capita (in liters)

Weight (30%)

Population (in million)

Weight (25%)

Total

China

14.6

3.7

18.2

3.6

32

9.6

1,394.0

348.5

365.4

Mexico

58.9

14.7

19.9

4.0

62.1

18.63

128.6

32.2

69.5

Chile

169.2

42.3

24.6

4.9

43

12.9

18.2

4.5

64.7

Canada

106.4

26.6

48.4

9.7

57.7

17.31

37.7

9.4

63.0

Germany

0.9

0.2

50.8

10.2

104.2

31.26

80.2

20.0

61.7

Japan

30.6

7.7

42.9

8.6

41.4

12.42

126

31.4

60.0

Czech Rep.

0

0.0

35.5

7.1

143.3

42.99

10.7

2.7

52.8

UK

22.2

5.6

44.8

9.0

67.7

20.31

65.8

16.4

51.3

South Korea

66.6

16.7

39.5

7.9

42.8

12.84

51.8

13.0

50.3

Netherlands

5.8

1.5

53.9

10.8

69.8

20.94

17.3

4.3

37.5

Table 1. Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Exports Markets for Table and Kitchenware

Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Export Markets for Table and Kitchenware

Criteria

Weight

Canada

Germany

China

Netherlands

United Kingdom

Population

2

4

2

1

5

3

Pop. Growth rate

2

1

5

4

3

2

Urbanization %

3

3

2

5

1

4

GDP Per Capita

3

3

2

5

1

4

GDP Growth Rate

3

4

3

1

2

5

Export Value

4

5

2

1

3

4

FAS Value

4

1

3

4

5

2

Imported Value

4

2

1

5

4

3

Weighted Score

72

65

83

76

79

The Weighted Score is multiplied by the weight to arrive at the total weighted score.

Quantitative analysis of contending countries

Table 1 shows the countries quantitative score of activity with each indicator. The countries are ordinally ranked based on their quantitative score (e.g., the country with the highest import activity receives a 1; conversely, the country with the least amount of import activity receives a 6). The only indicator that is inversely ranked is the unemployment rate, as a lower percentage indicates more favorable conditions.

Table 1. Contending countries quantitative score with each indicator of market potential.

Criteria

China

Germany

Japan

Netherlands

Norway

Sweden

Imports with US

$636B

$557B

$204.2B

$60B

$12.2B

$4.44B

Per Capita (PPP)

$16,700

$42,800

$50,400

$72,100

$72,000

$51,200

EV Annual Sales (2018)

1,016,002

52,013

67,504

86,290

29,187

19,793

Unemployment rate (%)

3.9

3.8

2.9

4.9

3.2

6.7

EVs/1,000 people Ratio

1.6

2

2.4

55.9

8.4

7.8

Source(s): CIA World Factbook; IMF World Economic Outlook database; Santander Trade Markets; US Dept. of Commerce.

Decision matrix and country ranking for Electric Vehicles

Once the countries are ordinally ranked, their score is then multiplied by the weight, representative of the level of influence each indicator has on exporting, and the weighted scores are totaled with the lowest score representing the country with the most favorable market conditions for exporting (see Table 2). As demonstrated in Table 2, the top three international markets of export potential are Norway, Germany, and China, with the three lowest weighted scores, 47, 53, and 56, respectively.

Table 2. Decision matrix with contending countries, indicators of market potential and the respective weight.

Criteria

Weight

China

Germany

Japan

Netherlands

Norway

Sweden

Imports with US

3

3

6

9

12

15

18

Per Capita (PPP)

2

12

10

8

2

4

6

EV Annual Sales (2018)

5

5

15

20

25

10

30

Unemployment rate (%)

4

16

12

4

20

8

24

EVs/1,000 people Ratio

4

24

16

20

8

4

12

Weighted Score

60

59

61

67

41

90

To summarize, the top three potential markets are Norway, Germany, and China, based on a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of several factors used to indicate the market potential for exporting. These factors examine the countrys level of trade activity with the US, signifying established trade agreements, two economic indicators of purchasing power parity and unemployment rates, and two factors representing a countrys quantitative level of activity pertaining to electric vehicles, consisting of annual sales and a ratio of number of EVs per 1,000 people in the respective population.

2.1

M
atrix

Potential

for Beer Export
s

Country

Total US
exports y.

2019 (in
million
dollars)

Weight
(25%)

GDP per
capita (in
thousands$)

Weight
(20%)

Beer
Consumption
per capita (in
liters)

Weight
(30%)

Population
(in million)

Weight
(25%)

Total

China

14.6

3.7

18.2

3.6

32

9.6

1,394.0

348.5

365.4

Mexico

58.9

14.7

19.9

4.0

62.1

18.63

128.6

32.2

69.5

Chile

169.2

42.3

24.6

4.9

43

12.9

18.2

4.5

64.7

Canada

106.4

26.6

48.4

9.7

57.7

17.31

37.7

9.4

63.0

Germany

0.9

0.2

50.8

10.2

104.2

31.26

80.2

20.0

61.7

Japan

30.6

7.7

42.9

8.6

41.4

12.42

126

31.4

60.0

Czech Rep.

0

0.0

35.5

7.1

143.3

42.99

10.7

2.7

52.8

UK

22.2

5.6

44.8

9.0

67.7

20.31

65.8

16.4

51.3

South Korea

66.6

16.7

39.5

7.9

42.8

12.84

51.8

13.0

50.3

Netherlands

5.8

1.5

53.9

10.8

69.8

20.94

17.3

4.3

37.5

Table
1
. Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Exports Markets for
Table and Kitchenware

Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Export Markets for Table and Kitchenware

Criteria

Weight

C
anada

Germany

China

Netherlands

United Kingdom

Population

2

4

2

1

5

3

Pop. Growth rate

2

1

5

4

3

2

Urbanization

%

3

3

2

5

1

4

GDP Per Capita

3

3

2

5

1

4

GDP Growth Rate

3

4

3

1

2

5

Export Value

4

5

2

1

3

4

FAS Value

4

1

3

4

5

2

Imported Value

4

2

1

5

4

3

Weighted Score

72

65

83

76

79

The Weighted Score is
multiplied by the weight to arrive at the total weighted score.

Quantitative analysis of contending

countries

2.1 Matrix Potential for Beer Exports
Country
Total US
exports y.
2019 (in
million
dollars)
Weight
(25%)
GDP per
capita (in
thousands$)
Weight
(20%)
Beer
Consumption
per capita (in
liters)
Weight
(30%)
Population
(in million)
Weight
(25%)
Total
China 14.6 3.7 18.2 3.6 32 9.6 1,394.0 348.5 365.4
Mexico 58.9 14.7 19.9 4.0 62.1 18.63 128.6 32.2 69.5
Chile 169.2 42.3 24.6 4.9 43 12.9 18.2 4.5 64.7
Canada 106.4 26.6 48.4 9.7 57.7 17.31 37.7 9.4 63.0
Germany 0.9 0.2 50.8 10.2 104.2 31.26 80.2 20.0 61.7
Japan 30.6 7.7 42.9 8.6 41.4 12.42 126 31.4 60.0
Czech Rep. 0 0.0 35.5 7.1 143.3 42.99 10.7 2.7 52.8
UK 22.2 5.6 44.8 9.0 67.7 20.31 65.8 16.4 51.3
South Korea 66.6 16.7 39.5 7.9 42.8 12.84 51.8 13.0 50.3
Netherlands 5.8 1.5 53.9 10.8 69.8 20.94 17.3 4.3 37.5

Table 1. Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Exports Markets for Table and Kitchenware
Weighted Decision Matrix of Potential Export Markets for Table and Kitchenware
Criteria Weight Canada Germany China Netherlands United Kingdom
Population 2 4 2 1 5 3
Pop. Growth rate 2 1 5 4 3 2
Urbanization % 3 3 2 5 1 4
GDP Per Capita 3 3 2 5 1 4
GDP Growth Rate 3 4 3 1 2 5
Export Value 4 5 2 1 3 4
FAS Value 4 1 3 4 5 2
Imported Value 4 2 1 5 4 3
Weighted Score 72 65 83 76 79
The Weighted Score is multiplied by the weight to arrive at the total weighted score.
Quantitative analysis of contending countries Sample of a draft decision matrix for the export of bottled malt beer

In the report will needed to be included the reasoning for selecting these indicators and weights
Top potential markets
1. Chile
2. Canada
3. South Korea

Criteria

Wt.

Canada

Chile

Mexico

Honduras

South Korea

Panama

Paraguay

Japan

UK

Guatemala

2019 Exports to Country of US Beer

Qty

1

$112m

$106m

$58m

$53m

$53m

$27m

$26m

$22m

$20m

$20m

Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

5-year Export Growth

Change

0.8

-27%

123%

-27%

802%

440%

8%

14%

275%

-7%

1085%

Rank

9

5

10

2

3

7

6

4

8

1

2019 Import to US of Beer

Qty

0.5

$109m

$11k

$3.9B

$235K

$4.5m

$38k

0

$7.7m

$19m

$3.8m

Rank

9

2

10

4

7

3

1

6

8

5

Beer Consumption per capita

Liters

0.5

55.7L

50L

68.7L

15.9L

42.8L

76.8L

32.8

41.4L

72.9L

15L

Rank

4

5

3

9

6

1

8

7

2

10

Per Capita Income

Amount

0.8

$47k

$25k

$19k

$5k

$39k

25k

$13k

$42k

$45k

$8k

Rank

1

5

7

10

4

6

8

3

2

9

Weighted Score

15.5

13.5

23.1

20.1

17.1

18.4

22.7

20.1

22

35.5

Export Data from USITC Trade Database
HS Code 22030000 Beer made from malt, in bottles holding

Quantity Rank

Country

Year 2015

Year 2019

5 yr Change

Change $

1

Canada

154,159,600

111,886,610

-27%

-42,272,990

2

Chile

47,336,077

105,775,990

123%

58,439,913

3

Mexico

179,544,415

58,875,636

-67%

-120,668,779

4

Honduras

5,826,055

52,550,079

802%

46,724,024

5

South Korea

9,730,557

52,523,300

440%

42,792,743

6

Panama

25,063,735

27,078,591

8%

2,014,856

7

Paraguay

22,683,034

25,914,384

14%

3,231,350

8

Japan

5,766,438

21,639,111

275%

15,872,673

9

United Kingdom

21,580,470

20,009,869

-7%

-1,570,601

10

Guatemala

1,677,947

19,879,092

1085%

18,201,145

11

Sweden

23,138,308

17,381,882

-25%

-5,756,426

12

Taiwan

8,198,356

16,438,074

101%

8,239,718

13

China

6,875,605

14,558,006

112%

7,682,401

14

Dominican Rep

4,780,230

9,824,837

106%

5,044,607

15

United Arab Em

4,414,693

8,683,550

97%

4,268,857

16

Bahamas

3,296,180

8,283,368

151%

4,987,188

17

Singapore

3,366,529

6,909,672

105%

3,543,143

18

Peru

1,668,077

5,776,578

246%

4,108,501

19

Netherlands

3,731,979

5,725,565

53%

1,993,586

20

France

953,460

5,546,542

482%

4,593,082

IMPORT Data from USITC Trade Database
HS Code 22030000 Beer made from malt, in bottles holding

Rank

Country

Year 2019

1

Mexico

3,946,951,082

2

Netherlands

723,657,935

3

Belgium

366,971,030

4

Ireland

191,195,642

5

Canada

109,540,628

6

Germany

83,173,453

7

Italy

23,058,185

8

Dominican Rep

22,370,907

9

United Kingdom

18,786,321

10

Jamaica

18,181,670

11

Vietnam

10,504,864

12

Poland

9,141,769

13

Japan

7,648,122

14

Czech Republic

6,100,622

15

Austria

5,598,747

16

China

5,007,085

17

South Korea

4,538,237

18

France

4,008,818

19

India

3,872,410

20

Guatemala

3,750,523

Sample of a draft decision matrix for the export of bottled malt beer

In
the

report will needed to be included the reasoning for selecting these indicators and weights

Top potential markets

1.

Chile

2.

C
anada

3.

South Korea

Criteria

Wt.

Canada

Chile

Mexico

Honduras

South
Korea

Panama

Paraguay

Japan

UK

Guatemala

2019 Exports
to Count
ry

of
US Beer

Qty

1

$112m

$106m

$58m

$53m

$53m

$27m

$26m

$22m

$20m

$20m

Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

5

year

Export
Growth

Change

0.8


27%

123%


27%

802%

440%

8%

14
%

275%


7%

1085%

Ran
k

9

5

10

2

3

7

6

4

8

1

2019 Import
to US of Beer

Qty

0.5

$109m

$11k

$3.9B

$235K

$4.5m

$38k

0

$
7.7m

$19m

$3.8m

Rank

9

2

10

4

7

3

1

6

8

5

Beer
Consumption
per capita

Liters

0.
5

55.7L

50L

68.7
L

15.9L

42.8L

76.8
L

32.8

41.4L

72.9
L

15L

Rank

4

5

3

9

6

1

8

7

2

10

Per Capita
Income

Amount

0.8

$4
7
k

$25k

$19k

$5k

$39k

25k

$13k

$42k

$4
5
k

$8k

Rank

1

5

7

10

4

6

8

3

2

9

Weighted
Score

15.5

13.5

23.1

20.1

17.1

1
8.4

22.7

20.1

22

35.5

Export Data from USITC Trade Database

H
S Code
2203000
0
Beer made from malt, in bottles holding

Quantity
Rank

Country

Year 2015

Year 2019

5 yr
Change

Change $

Sample of a draft decision matrix for the export of bottled malt beer
In the report will needed to be included the reasoning for selecting these indicators and weights
Top potential markets
1. Chile
2. Canada
3. South Korea

Criteria Wt. Canada Chile Mexico Honduras South
Korea
Panama Paraguay Japan UK Guatemala
2019 Exports
to Country of
US Beer
Qty
1
$112m $106m $58m $53m $53m $27m $26m $22m $20m $20m
Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20
5-year
Export
Growth
Change 0.8 -27% 123% -27% 802% 440% 8% 14% 275% -7% 1085%
Rank 9 5 10 2 3 7 6 4 8 1
2019 Import
to US of Beer
Qty 0.5 $109m $11k $3.9B $235K $4.5m $38k 0 $7.7m $19m $3.8m
Rank 9 2 10 4 7 3 1 6 8 5
Beer
Consumption
per capita
Liters 0.5 55.7L 50L 68.7L 15.9L 42.8L 76.8L 32.8 41.4L 72.9L 15L
Rank 4 5 3 9 6 1 8 7 2 10
Per Capita
Income
Amount 0.8 $47k $25k $19k $5k $39k 25k $13k $42k $45k $8k
Rank 1 5 7 10 4 6 8 3 2 9
Weighted
Score
15.5 13.5 23.1 20.1 17.1 18.4 22.7 20.1 22 35.5

Export Data from USITC Trade Database
HS Code 22030000 Beer made from malt, in bottles holding

Quantity
Rank Country Year 2015 Year 2019
5 yr
Change
Change $

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *