Deep Fake Technology and Ethics Deep Fake Technology and Ethics Justifi

Deep Fake Technology and Ethics

Deep Fake Technology and Ethics

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Deep Fake Technology and Ethics Deep Fake Technology and Ethics Justifi
From as Little as $13/Page

Justification for the Topic

Deep fake technology, which employs artificial intelligence to produce incredibly lifelike videos and images that can trick and control viewers, has become a significant ethical problem. Deep fake technology has advanced quickly, making it possible for people to produce convincing videos and images that can be used to sway public opinion, harm reputations, or defraud people (Itie, 2023). This raises serious ethical questions about privacy, fraud, and dissemination of false information. As this technology becomes more widely available, assessing its moral implications and thinking about ways to lessen potential harm is crucial.

Research Issues

How does deep fake technology affect people’s right to privacy?
Justification: Concerning people’s ability to manage their image and the risk of privacy invasion, deep fake technology raises serious issues.

Research results.

Deep fake technology is frequently used to produce convincing videos or images of people who never existed. These videos raise significant concerns about privacy and the misuse of personal data because they can be used to slander, harass, or extort people. Further, deep fake technology is frequently used to insert people’s faces into pornographic material, causing victims to experience severe emotional distress. Unfortunately, many questions regarding privacy concerns remain unanswered because legal frameworks have not yet fully caught up with this new technology.
The right to privacy and the significance of informed consent are just some ethical precepts that apply to this situation. Individuals must oversee their personal information for the principle of respect for privacy to be upheld, and it must also be safeguarded against misuse or unapproved access (Farish, 2020). Individuals must be fully informed about the risks and potential adverse effects of any technology or intervention that may affect them to give informed consent, a fundamental principle in medical ethics. Individuals must also be free to decide how their personal information will be used.

How might deep fake technology affect false information and political discourse propagation?
Justification: The spread of false information and public deception could be made possible by deep fake technology, which could significantly negatively impact political discourse and democratic procedures.

Research results.

There are worries that deep fake technology could sway public opinion or destroy political reputations because it has already been used to make convincing videos or images of politicians. In addition, deep fake technology also possesses the capacity to produce phony evidence that might be used in court cases or other legal contexts (Burkell, 2020). This prompt worries about the spread of false information and possible harm to democratic processes.
The importance of openness and accountability, the requirement to defend democratic institutions, and the ethical precept of non-maleficence, which calls for people to refrain from harming others, are some of the ethical principles that apply to this issue. In a democratic society, transparency and accountability are fundamental values. It is truer than ever in the age of deep fake technology. The public should have access to accurate information about the sources of this information, and people and organizations responsible for any false information disseminated using this technology should be held accountable.

How can society deal with the moral issues brought up by deep fake technology?
Justification: It is critical to consider how to reduce the potential harm and address the ethical issues brought up by deep fake technology as it develops and becomes more widely available.

Research Findings.

The ethical issues brought up by deep-fake technology can be addressed in several ways. These include creating legal frameworks to address privacy issues and potential harm, funding research to create new detection and authentication technologies, raising public awareness, and educating the public about deep fake technology’s dangers and potential harms.
The ethical principles of justice and beneficence, which demand that resources and benefits be distributed equally and fairly among all people and require actions to advance others’ well-being, respectively, are the ethical principles that apply to this issue (Karnouskos, 2020). In addition, the idea of autonomy, which states that decision-making should be left up to individual people and that those decisions should be respected, is also essential.
The principle of beneficence, for instance, would dictate that if the research question concerned the moral ramifications of using artificial intelligence (AI) in hiring procedures, it must enhance the hiring procedure and advance the interests of both the organization and the job applicants. To uphold the principle of justice, AI must be applied fairly and equitably to all job applicants, without prejudice based on race, gender, age, or any other factor. Finally, according
to the autonomy principle, job candidates must be aware of how AI is used in the hiring process and allowed to opt-out.

Research Conclusions

Deep fake technology can produce compelling fake videos or audio recordings by using algorithms to manipulate already-existing media. Even though this technology may be helpful for entertainment and education, it also carries a significant risk of harm, especially regarding privacy, political debate, and spreading false information (Citron, 2019). With the aid of deep fake technology, deceptive videos that manipulate people or disseminate incorrect information can be made that look real. Politics, national security, and individual privacy are some areas where this could have adverse effects.
It’s crucial to create legal frameworks that control the application of deep fake technology to address these moral issues. Governments and regulatory organizations can collaborate to develop standards and guidelines for using this technology, including unambiguous guidelines for producing and distributing deep fake media. This can guard against technology misuse and safeguard individuals and society.
To address the ethical issues raised by deep fake technology, research funding is an additional crucial step. Research can advance our knowledge of this technology’s dangers and potential adverse effects and help us create tools and strategies for identifying and thwarting deep fake media (Santiago, 2020). Academics, business people, and government organizations can participate in this research, which should be collaborative and interdisciplinary.
Further educating the public about deep fake technology’s dangers and potential adverse effects is also crucialthe public needs to know the potential risks of deep fake means and how to spot them. Public education campaigns, media literacy courses, and other forms of outreachareefficientwaystoachievethis.The responsible and ethical use of technology by people and organizations should also be encouraged, with an emphasis on promoting transparency and informed consent.
In conclusion, deep fake technology raises serious ethical issues regarding personal information, political speech, and the dissemination of false information. Although this technology has potential advantages, precautions must be taken to reduce its risks and drawbacks. Legal frameworks, research, public awareness, and education can help achieve this. Respect for privacy, the requirement to defend democratic institutions, the necessity of informed consent, and the value of openness in applying this technology are just a few of the ethical principles that apply.

References

Itie, (2023). Decisions for Implementing Artificial Intelligence Technology for Workforce Management (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland University College).
Farish, (2020). Do deep fakes pose a golden opportunity? Considering whether English law should adopt California’s publicity right in the age of the deep fake. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(1), 40-48.
Gosse, C., & Burkell, (2020). Politics and porn: how news media characterizes problems presented by deep fakes. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 37(5), 497-511.
Karnouskos, (2020). Artificial intelligence in digital media: The era of deep fakes. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 1(3), 138-147.
Santiago, (2020). Artificial Intelligence: AI Inherent Bias and Influence on the Executive Function and Authority of Business Leaders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland University College).
Chesney, R., & Citron, (2019). Deepfakes and the new disinformation war: The coming age of post-truth geopolitics. Foreign Aff., 98, 147.

6 Group Review of Title of Paper
Group # (1, 2, 3, or 4)
Full School Name
Date of Submission
Names of Team Members
Written by name – place leader of the group name

Introduction
Author of paper
Overview of the topic selected
Rationale for selection

Written by name (Author of the paper selected)

Submission Observations
Highlights only
Detail comments as well as references go in the notes sections

Name of Student Who Wrote This Slide

Other Areas or Issues to Consider
Highlights only
Detail comments as well as references go in the notes sections

Name of Student Who Wrote This Slide

Fin!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *