com510
Communications Plan Portfolio: Internal and External Stakeholder Analysis
Earlier in the course, you chose an organization and some type of organizational change.
You then identified various objectives of the proposed change.
This week, you will identify the relevant internal and external stakeholders for the organization, the best method for communicating with them, and any challenges in communicating with these stakeholders.
In 1,000-1,250, words do the following:
Identify all of the people within and outside of the organization that will be affected by the organizational change.
Explain how this organizational change will affect all of the different stakeholders.
If the change will affect various stakeholders in different ways, make sure to explain how it will.
Determine the best method for communicating with these various stakeholders (e.g., e-mail, face-to-face, department meeting, flyer).
Explain why you would choose this particular method of communication.
Identify any potential challenges of communicating to the various stakeholders (e.g., People may not check their email) and how you will overcome those challenges.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
An Abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
COM-510 COM-510-O500 Communications Plan Portfolio: Internal and External Stakeholder Analysis 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Identify all the internal and external stakeholders that will be affected by the organizational change. Explain how the organizational change will affect the different stakeholders. If the change will affect various stakeholders in different ways, make sure to explain how it will. 30.0% Essay does not identify the internal and external stakeholders and explain how the organizational change will affect each stakeholder differently. Details are not given. Essay identifies the internal and external stakeholders and explains how the organizational change will affect each stakeholder differently. The explanation is not based on sound reasoning and is poorly described. Essay identifies the internal and external stakeholders and explains how the organizational change will affect each stakeholder differently. Explanation is somewhat limited but is based on sound reasoning. The essay identifies the internal and external stakeholders and explains how the organizational change will affect each stakeholder differently. The explanation provides clear and accurate details. The essay identifies the internal and external stakeholders and explains how the organizational change will affect each stakeholder differently. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful, showing excellent insight.
Determine the best method for communicating with these various stakeholders (e.g., email, face-to-face, department meeting, flyer). Explain why you would choose this particular method of communication. 20.0% Essay does not determine the best method to communicate with the stakeholders. Rationale for the choices is not given. Essay determines a method to communicate with the stakeholders. The rationale for the choices made is not based on sound reasoning and is poorly described. Essay determines the best method to communicate with the stakeholders. Rationale for choices is somewhat limited but is based on sound reasoning. The essay clearly determines the best method to communicate with the stakeholders. The rationale for choices made provides clear and accurate details. The essay determines the best method to communicate with the stakeholders. Rationale for choices is comprehensive and shows excellent insight.
Identify any potential challenges of communicating to the various stakeholders (e.g., people may not check their email). and how you will overcome those challenges. 20.0% Essay does not identify any potential challenges of communicating to stakeholders. Does not explain how challenges could be overcome. Details are not given. Essay identifies any potential challenges of communicating to stakeholders. The explanation of how challenges could be overcome is not based on sound reasoning and is poorly described. Essay identifies any potential challenges of communicating to stakeholders. Explanation of how challenges could be overcome is somewhat limited but is based on sound reasoning. The essay identifies any potential challenges of communicating to stakeholders. The explanation of how challenges could be overcome provides clear and accurate details. The essay identifies any potential challenges of communicating to stakeholders. Explanation of how challenges could be overcome is comprehensive and insightful showing excellent insight.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%
