Case Brief The Case9.5: Palsgraf v. Long Island Ry. Co., 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1328) Use any source for this assignment you don’t have to use the book. M

Case Brief
The Case9.5: Palsgraf v. Long Island Ry. Co., 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1328)
Use any source for this assignment you don’t have to use the book. Make sure you follow the outline and the rubric.
In Modules 2, 3, and 4 you will be assigned cases from the text book or other source to brief. Please follow the format described in the “Tips on Case Briefs” below.

Case Briefs Rubric- updated

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Case Brief The Case9.5: Palsgraf v. Long Island Ry. Co., 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1328) Use any source for this assignment you don’t have to use the book. M
From as Little as $13/Page

Criteria Ratings Pts

Case name and

citation

Include the last names of

the parties and citation

just as in the text.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS EXCELLENT.

5.0 pts

Include the last names

of the parties and

citation just as in the

text. MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS ABOVE

AVERAGE.

4.0 pts

Include the last names

of the parties and

citation just as in the

text. MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS AVERAGE.

3.0 pts

Include the last names

of the parties and

citation just as in the

text. MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS BELOW

AVERAGE.

2.0 pts

5.0 pts

Parties

Clearly identify the

parties. Specifically

state the plaintiff(s) and

the defendant(s) in the

case. MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS EXCELLENT.

5.0 pts

Clearly identify the

parties. Specifically state

the plaintiff(s) and the

defendant(s) in the case.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS ABOVE AVERAGE.

4.0 pts

Clearly identify the

parties. Specifically

state the plaintiff(s) and

the defendant(s) in the

case. MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS AVERAGE.

3.0 pts

Clearly identify the

parties. Specifically state

the plaintiff(s) and the

defendant(s) in the case.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS BELOW AVERAGE.

2.0 pts

5.0 pts

Procedure History

The results are clearly

stated at each level of

the court system.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS EXCELLENT.

10.0 pts

The results are clearly

stated at each level of

the court system.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS ABOVE AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

The results are clearly

stated at each level of

the court system.

MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS AVERAGE.

7.0 pts

The results are clearly

stated at each level of

the court system.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS BELOW AVERAGE.

5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Facts

Facts included are

pertinent to the issue

before the Court.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS EXCELLENT.

15.0 pts

Facts included are

pertinent to the issue

before the Court.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS ABOVE AVERAGE.

13.0 pts

Facts included are

pertinent to the issue

before the Court.

MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS AVERAGE.

11.0 pts

Facts included are

pertinent to the issue

before the Court.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS BELOW AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

15.0 pts

Case Briefs Rubric- updated

Criteria Ratings Pts

Issue

The Issue(s) are

identified separately and

in the form of a question

that can be “yes” or

“no”. MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS EXCELLENT.

10.0 pts

The Issue(s) are

identified separately

and in the form of a

question that can be

“yes” or “no”. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS ABOVE

AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

The Issue(s) are

identified separately

and in the form of a

question that can be

“yes” or “no”. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

AVERAGE.

7.0 pts

The Issue(s) are

identified separately

and in the form of a

question that can be

“yes” or “no”. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

BELOW AVERAGE.

5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Summary of

Arguments

The parties argument(s)

are clearly stated.

MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS EXCELLENT

10.0 pts

The parties argument(s)

are clearly stated.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS ABOVE AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

The parties

argument(s) are clearly

stated. MASTERY OF

THIS FACET IS

AVERAGE.

7.0 pts

The parties argument(s)

are clearly stated.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS BELOW AVERAGE.

5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Rule

The law is stated that

the court applied to

make its decision.

MASTER OF THIS FACET

IS EXCELLENT.

10.0 pts

The law is stated that

the court applied to

make its decision.

MASTER OF THIS FACET

IS ABOVE AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

The law is stated that

the court applied to

make its decision.

MASTER OF THIS FACET

IS AVERAGE.

7.0 pts

The law is stated that

the court applied to

make its decision.

MASTER OF THIS FACET

IS BELOW AVERAGE.

5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Court’s Reasoning

All issues are identified

and the reasoning and

facts are clear. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

EXCELLENT.

15.0 pts

All issues are identified

and the reasoning and

facts are clear. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS ABOVE

AVERAGE.

13.0 pts

All issues are identified

and the reasoning and

facts are clear.

MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS AVERAGE.

11.0 pts

All issues are identified

and the reasoning and

facts are clear. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

BELOW AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

15.0 pts

Case Briefs Rubric- updated

Criteria Ratings Pts

Holding

The court’s answer to

the question is stated in

yes or no format with

limited explanation.

Holdings for each issue

are identified. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

EXCELLENT.

10.0 pts

The court’s answer to

the question is stated in

yes or no format with

limited explanation.

Holdings for each issue

are identified. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS ABOVE

AVERAGE.

8.0 pts

The court’s answer to

the question is stated in

yes or no format with

limited explanation.

Holdings for each issue

are identified. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

AVERAGE.

7.0 pts

The court’s answer to

the question is stated in

yes or no format with

limited explanation.

Holdings for each issue

are identified. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS BELOW

AVERAGE.

5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Disposition

The court’s final action is

clearly stated. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS

EXCELLENT.

5.0 pts

The court’s final action is

clearly stated. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS ABOVE

AVERAGE.

4.0 pts

The court’s final action

is clearly stated.

MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS AVERAGE.

3.0 pts

The court’s final action is

clearly stated. MASTERY

OF THIS FACET IS BELOW

AVERAGE.

2.0 pts

5.0 pts

Dissenting/Concurring

Opinions

Concurring opinion are

stated clearly if present.

MASTERY OF THIS

FACET IS EXCELLENT.

5.0 pts

Concurring opinion are

stated clearly if present.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS ABOVE AVERAGE.

4.0 pts

Concurring opinion are

stated clearly if

present. MASTERY OF

THIS FACET IS

AVERAGE.

3.0 pts

Concurring opinion are

stated clearly if present.

MASTERY OF THIS FACET

IS BELOW AVERAGE.

2.0 pts

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0 Case Briefs: An Overview

A Case Brief is a tool attorneys and judges use to better understand a case. When a court makes any decision in a case, the court typically drafts what is termed an opinion or an order. These opinions/orders can be lengthy when a case is complex. In order to digest and understand such opinions/orders, it is common practice for attorneys to create an outline of the order. This outline is commonly referred to as a Case Brief. The ultimate purpose of a Case Brief is to help a reader understand why a court reached the decision it did. A Case Brief typically has seven to nine different sections that are important to understanding the case:

(1) Parties: This sections lists the names of the parties involved in the dispute. Many times there are multiple plaintiffs and defendants. Clearly defining the parties is essential to understanding what each party is asking a court to do.

(2) Procedural History: This section is sometimes omitted, but if the opinion is issued by an appellate court, it is always included. The procedural history describes pertinent previous decisions in the case made by other courts (typically trial courts). For example, if a party is appealing a trial courts order to an appellate court, include that information in the procedural history section. Many times, the history of a case in a lower trial court dictates the extent to which an appellate court can review the lower courts decision.

(3) Facts: This section outlines the important facts of the case. There are many, many facts in any case. However, when a court addresses a particular issue of the case, not all of the facts may be important. The purpose of this section is to help the reader focus only on those facts that are important to the issue before the Court. This section should not serve as a recitation of the facts.

(4) Issue: This section is the most important for individuals who are new to reading legal writing. One of the most difficult tasks when reading an opinion is determining what the Court is being asked to do or to decide. Some courts clearly state the issue of the case (e.g. The issue before the Court is whether . . . .), while other courts do not articulate the issue as bluntly. Either way, identifying the issue the court is being asked to address is the first step to determine what the court decided. Please note, there may be more than one issue in a case!

(5) Summary of Arguments: This section is also sometimes omitted, particularly when the parties arguments are straightforward. However, knowing what the parties argue is key to understand how the court addresses those arguments. Many times the parties arguments frame the legal question for a court.

(6) Rule: In every order/opinion, a court is applying a rule of law. In this section, always state the rule of law the Court is applying and/or interpreting and any subsidiary rules that help to explain other rules.

(7) Courts Reasoning: This section is the heart of a Case Brief. A courts reasoning outlines how the court applied the rule of law to the facts. Much of lawyering is comparing and contrasting. Typically this section outlines how a court compared or distinguished the facts of its case to the facts of other cases with the same or similar issue. In other words, this section outlines what the court was thinking. I equate this section with showing your work on the complicated math problem. Many times understanding why a court reached a particular conclusion is more important than understanding what the conclusion was. This section helps a reader do just that it helps answer why?.

(8) Holding: This section outlines a courts ultimate decision or conclusion. The holding is usually only a few sentences and it prefaced with the Court holds or the the Court concludes.

(9) Disposition: This section outlines how a court disposes of a case.

Case Briefs are typically drafted in an outline format so they can be easily referenced. Here is an example of a Case Brief outline:

Case Name

Citation

Parties:

Plaintiff(s):

Defendant(s):

Procedure History:

Facts:

Issue:

Summary of Arguments:

argues

argues

Rule:

Courts Reasoning:

Holding:

Disposition:

Dissenting/Concurring Opinion:

Tips on Case Briefs and Grading

Points will be divided by the number of cases you’re briefing to equal 100 points total:

Case name and citation: Include the last names of the parties and citation just as in the text. (5 points)

Parties: Clearly identify the parties. Specifically state the plaintiff(s) and the defendant(s) in the case. (5 points)

Procedure History: Include the results at each level of the court system. For instance, the trial court found for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed and the case was overturned by the appellate court. You will always have 2 levels in your brief (trial court/appellate court), and maybe more depending on how far the case has progressed. (10 points)

Facts: Don’t copy all of the facts provided; instead, include only those facts pertinent to the issue before the Court. Select those facts necessary for you to understand what is happening between the parties or the court. Review the facts to be sure to select only those facts most relevant to the outcome of the case. For instance, if the case was a hit and run, the fact that the victim said the car that hit him was red, then the color “red” is a relevant fact. (Especially if the defendant’s car is blue.) However, if the case is a contract for the purchase of a specific car, the fact that the car being purchased is “red” is probably not a relevant fact. Be sure to capture the relevant facts. (15 points)

Issue: Put this in the form of a question that can be answered “yes” or “no.” Usually the author of the text has edited the case to illustrate a single issue. However, sometimes there may be more than one issue. If so, be sure to identify all of the issues separately. (10 points: divided by the number of issues in the case)

Summary of Arguments: What did the parties argue to the court? If the parties made more than one arguments, be sure to include those. (10 points)

Rule: State the law the court applied to make its decision. (10 points).

Courts Reasoning: Why did the court hold the way it did? What facts were used to made the determination (hint – these are your relevant facts)? Be sure to have a reasoning for each issue when you identify more than one issue. (15 points)

Holding: What was the court’s answer to the question? This should be either “yes” or “no” with limited explanation. However, be sure not to explain the courts reasoning. Also, be sure to have a holding for each issue when you identify more than one issue. (10 points: divided by the number of holdings in the case)

Disposition: What was the court’s final action taken? (5 points)

NOTE on dissenting/concurring opinions: Sometimes a member of the court will agree with the majority decision (concur), but for reasons different than the majority opinion, or will disagree (dissent), and that member will write a separate opinion to be included in the ruling on the case. If there are dissent or concurring opinions please discuss these opinions. Not every case will have another judge’s opinion, if that’s the case, just put N/A. (5 points)

1

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *