Case analysis 2 Case analysis Running head: CASE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE 1 CASE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE 2 Case Analysis Robust Airline Schedule Planning Your

Case analysis 2
Case analysis

Running head: CASE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Case analysis 2 Case analysis Running head: CASE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE 1 CASE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE 2 Case Analysis Robust Airline Schedule Planning Your
From as Little as $13/Page

1

CASE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE
2

Case Analysis

Robust Airline Schedule Planning
Your Name
Section Number

College of Aeronautics
Florida Institute of Technology

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of

AVM 4302 Aviation Law

Introduction

The construction of timetables for an airline is composed of aircraft and crew. Crew cost is the biggest controllable expenditure for an airline and effective crew assignment is a very important aspect of planning (Gopalakrishnan & Johnson, 2005). Wensveen (2016) defines: airline scheduling as the art of designing systemwide [sic] flight patterns that provide optimum public service, in both quantity and quality, consistent with the financial health of the carrier (p. 388). An airlines decision to offer certain flights is dependent on market demand forecasts, available aircraft operating characteristics, available work force, regulations, and the behavior of competing airlines (Bazargan, 2010, p. 31).

Problem

The problem is that the airline scheduling process in its entirety is very complex. Flight scheduling is the starting point for all other airline planning and operations (Bazargan, 2010, p. 31). Airlines are faced with a number of issues that they have no control over (e.g., illness, weather, volcanoes, earthquakes, etc.). Adding to the complexity are human factors, cultural issues, political issues, and more. Vast numbers of rules and regulations associated with airports, aircraft, and flight crews combined with the global expanse of air traffic networks has a direct impact on the scheduling process.

Significance of the Problem

When a problem arises that has an impact on the schedule that impact can ripple throughout the airlines network (Hamilton & Nilsson, 2010a). In some cases, a delay at a hub airport can have an impact on travelers around the globe. In 2006, the North American airline industry experienced a total of 116.5 million minutes of delay, totaling a $7.7 billion increase in operating costs. Passengers are typically unsympathetic to delays, as far as a passenger is concerned it is the airlines fault. With advancements in internet ticketing, travelers readily avoid an airline with poor on-time performance.

Development of Alternative Actions

Alternative Action 1

Airline and railway modes of transportation should form an intermodal alliance (Iatrou & Oretti, 2007, p. 88). This would enable travelers an option to continue with their travel plans.

Advantages. Access to airports through dedicated public transport could reduce problems associated with road traffic delays around airports. Iatrou and Oretti (2007) suggest an intermodal alliance near airports for quicker access to and from the airport (p. 89).

Disadvantages. The absence of interconnectivity, where air and rail industries have different infrastructures without common rules and facilities (Iatrou & Oretti, 2007, p. 89). High-speed rail links to airports are not profitable in the short-term.

Alternative Action 2

Extend flight schedules by extra minutes to boost on-time performance (McCartney, 2012).

Advantages. Passengers would spend less time on aircraft (McCartney, 2012). Airlines will have fewer planes sitting at terminal gates awaiting connecting passengers.

Disadvantages. An aircraft departing late for a flight will run late for the rest of its flight pattern for that day, and delays can grow exponentially (McCartney, 2012). A flight off the gate late may find a long line of planes waiting to take off or may find that the gate is no longer available at its destination resulting in an extended wait period (McCartney, 2012). The alternative actions may be presented in table form (see Table 1).

Recommendation

Sequential airline schedule planning of aircraft routing and flight crew-pairing decisions are made simultaneously to minimize flight crew and aircraft operating costs (Hamilton & Nilsson, 2010b). The advantage would be quicker turnaround time increasing aircraft utilization. The disadvantage would be flight crews and passengers with less time to connect between their flight legs (Wensveen, 2016). 3
References

Bazargan, M. (2010). Flight scheduling. In Airline operations and scheduling (2nd ed., pp. 31-40). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Gopalakrishnan, B., & Johnson, E. L. (2005). Airline crew scheduling: State-of-the-art. Annals of Operations Research, 140(1), 305-305. doi: 10.1007/s10479-005-3975-3

Hamilton, J. S., & Nilsson, S. (2020a). Practical aviation & aerospace law (7th ed.). Newcastle, WA: Aviation Supplies & Academics.

Hamilton, J. S., & Nilsson, S. (2020b). Practical aviation & aerospace law: Workbook (7th ed.). Newcastle, WA: Aviation Supplies & Academics.

Iatrou, K., & Oretti, M. (2007). Once rivals, now partners; how? In Airline choices for the future: From alliances to mergers (pp. 59-90). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

McCartney, S. (2012, June 14). The middle seat: Reality check: Why airlines are shrinking flight times. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Hunt Library website:
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1020180498?accountid=27203

Wensveen, J. G. (2016). Principles of airline scheduling. In Air transportation: A management perspective (8th ed., pp. 387-416). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Expectations of the Case Analysis Assignment

The introduction should set the stage, establish the environment, set out the nature of the problem. You should consider that you are establishing the context within which your problem exists. You must have in-text citation to substantiate your introduction.
The case analysis assignment requires you to identify and isolate just one problem. This problem should be well developed, where did it come from, why is it able to exist? What conditions and/or factors caused it or contributed to it? Your problem statement is the common thread that you weave throughout your analysis, everything must be connected to your problem. You must have in-text citation to substantiate your problem statement.

The significance of the problem is the result of the problem not being solved. You need to indicate what will happen if your problem is not addressed or fixed. This is your opportunity to tell management they need to do dedicate appropriate resources to fix the problem. You need in-text citation to substantiate the significance of your problem.

Alternative actions are corrective actions based upon the textbook and/or magazine/journal article and/or other sources you are using. You need two alternative actions, each much have reason or rationale, and two advantages and two disadvantages. Here again in-text citation must be used to substantiate your alternative courses of action.

The recommendation must be separate and distinctly different than either alternative action. You should consider what you would do to correct the problem if you had unlimited resources. The recommendation must have reason or rationale, one advantage and one disadvantage. And, in-text citation must be used to substantiate your recommendation.
A reference list (in accordance with the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association) must be compiled based solely upon the sources you used to substantiate your analyses.

Table 1

Matrix Format for Alternative Actions

Alternative Actions

Rationale

Advantages

Disadvantages

1. Meet existing

Existing

a. Reduces cost.
a. Additional

requirements as

requirements meet
b. No layoffs.

oversight.

Specified in Jacobs and
or exceed FAA

b. Government

Chase (2011).

safety standards.

waste.

2. Change existing

Safety can always be
a. Reflects a

a. Takes a lot

requirement.

improved upon.
positive approach
time to make

to safety.

changes.

b. Projects a

b. Results are

safety first

readily

philosophy.

available.

Note. This example is intended to demonstrate how a table can be used. This example includes an in-text and proper APA table formatting. Chapter Five
Organizing Business to Limit Liability

Chapter Five
Organizing Business to Limit Liability
Risk management skills

Protecting the business

Competition

Employees, vicarious liability

Partners

Attitude, professionalism-avoid hobby business

Organizing Business to Limit Liability
Forms of Business
Sole Proprietorship

General/limited Partnership

Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

Limited Liability Company (LLC)

Corporation

SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
Single Owner

Full control of business

Owner and business are one

Total profit and total liability

SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
Owner liable for lawsuits, debts, and other obligations from business operations

Capital formation can be a problem

All of the owners assets are on the line

Game-over if owner dies, retires, or sells out

GENERAL PARTNESHIP
Association of two or more partners

Carry on as business co-owners

Partnership is a separate legal entity

Can operate after death of a partner

Most basic type of partnership

GENERAL PARTNESHIP
Formed by partnership agreement

Must have one General partner

Assets are at risk
Burden of unlimited partnership liability

Partners have limited liability for obligations of partnership

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
General partner and limited partners

Joint and several liability rules are different

General partner

Management, with

Limited personal liability

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
Limited partners

Investors, with

Limited liability beyond investment

Federal and State registration requirements vary

Protect from vicarious liability/business debts

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Another form of starting a business

Less formal than corporation

File with a state Secretary of State

Owners avoid personal liability

Capitalization and tax advantages

Protect from vicarious liability/business debt

CORPORATION
Legal entity created by articles of incorporation

Operated with no individual liability

A legal person

Securing funds or going international

High maintenance

Protect from vicarious liability/business debts

CORPORATION
Formation
Owners initiate incorporation process

Articles filed with Secretary of State

Certificate of Incorporation Issued by Secretary of State

Statutory Agent appointed

Shareholders elect directors and adopt by-laws

LIMITING LIABILITY
Regardless of which organization is used

None offers protection against negligence

Duty to be reasonably careful,

Failure to be reasonably careful,

Proximate cause of

Injury

LIMITING LIABILITY
Type of organization is determined by:

Type of business/liability needs

Cost of formation

Capitalization requirements and sources

Transfer of ownership

Planned duration

Taxes

LIMITING LIABILITY
Very important decision early in the life of the business

Accountants

Lawyers

Federal, State, and Local considerations

Risk management-first step

OPERATING THE CORPORATION
Look like a corporation

Display the corporate nameInc.

Establish and maintain operating capital

Multiple owners/shareholders

OPERATING THE CORPORATION
Sound like a corporation

External communications

Internal communications

FAA, NTSB

With employees

OPERATING THE CORPORATION
Act like a corporation

Professional demeanor

Project your company image

Only one Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Richard Branson

OPERATING THE CORPORATION
Documentation

Establish, and

Maintain

A paper trail

OPERATING THE CORPORATION
Documentation

Authorized signatories

Separate personal assets from corporate assets

Corporate decisions

Leases, rental agreements, employee records, etc.

Minutes of corporate meetings

OPERATING THE CORPORATION
Duties to employees

Workers Compensation

Withholding taxes

Independent Contractors-qualification can be misinterpreted

Piercing the Corporate Veil
Getting around corporation status to hold individuals liable

Corporation commits fraud or harms public

Corporation is a fraud, shell company

Corporate formalities not followed

Piercing the Corporate Veil
Corporate and individual assets not separated

Alter ego finding by court

Operating like a partnership/sole proprietorship

After incorporation

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *