Discussion: Treatment of Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders (Week 4)
Assigned substance-related and addictive disorder: Alcohol-Related Disorders
Post:
Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned substance-related and addictive disorder.
Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned substance-related and addictive disorder.
Describe clinical features that you would expect to observe in a client that may have the substance-related and addictive disorder you were assigned. Align the clinical features with the DSM-5 criteria.
Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resources.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years In APA Format, Including introduction and conclusion.
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 1/4
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Outstanding
Performance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Procient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
Main
Posting:
Response to
the
discusion
question is
reecive
with critical
analysis and
synthesis
representive
of knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for
the module
and current
credible
sources.
44 (44%) – 44
(44%)
* Thoroughly
responds to the
discussion
question(s) *is
reective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative
of knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources. *
supported by at
least 3 current,
credible
sources
40 (40%) – 43
(43%)
* Responds to
the discussion
question(s) *is
reective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative
of knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. * 75%
of post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth *
supported by at
least 3 credible
references
35 (35%) – 39
(39%)
* Responds to
most of the
discussion
question(s) *is
somewhat
reective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative
of knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. * 50%
of post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth *
supported by at
least 3 credible
references
31 (31%) – 34
(34%)
* Responds to
some of the
discussion
question(s) *
one to two
criteria are not
addressed or
are
supercially
addressed *is
somewhat
lacking
reection and
critical analysis
and synthesis
*somewhat
represents
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for
the module. *
post is cited
with fewer than
2 credible
references
0 (0%) – 30
(30%)
* Does not
respond to
the discussion
question(s) *
lacks depth or
supercially
addresses
criteria *lacks
reection and
critical
analysis and
synthesis
*does not
represent
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for
the module. *
contains only
1 or no
credible
references
Name:NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 2/4
Outstanding
Performance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Procient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
Main
Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written
clearly and
concisely *
Contains no
grammatical or
spelling errors
* Fully adheres
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)
* Written
clearly and
concisely * May
contain one or
no grammatical
or spelling
error * Adheres
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written
concisely * May
contain one to
two
grammatical or
spelling error *
Adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)
*Written
somewhat
concisely * May
contain more
than two2
spelling or
grammatical
errors *
Contains some
APA formatting
errors
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Not written
clearly or
concisely *
Contains
more than
two spelling
or
grammatical
errors * Does
not adhere to
current APA
manual
writing rules
and style
Main
Posting:
Timely and
full
participation
10 (10%) – 10
(10%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts main
discussion by
due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation
First
Reponse
Post to
colleague’s
main post
that is
reective
and justied
with credible
sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings *
responds to
questions
posed by
faculty * the
use of scholarly
sources to
support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5
(8.5%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8
(8%)
* response has
some depth
and may
exhibit critical
thinking or
application to
practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7
(7%)
* response is
on topic, may
have some
depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* response
may not be on
topic, lacks
depth
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 3/4
Outstanding
Performance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Procient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
First
Reponse:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
fully answered
if posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
eectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
answered if
posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
eectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
*
Communication
is mostly
professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
mostly
answered if
posed *
Provides
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
few credible
sources *
Response is
written in
Standard
Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack eective
professional
communication
* Response to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered if
posed * Few or
no credible
sources are
cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion
lack eective
* Response to
faculty
questions are
missing * No
credible
sources are
cited
First
Reponse:
Timely and
full
participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts by due
date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation
Second
Reponse:
Post to
colleague’s
main post
that is
reective
and justied
with credible
sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings *
responds to
questions
posed by
faculty * the
use of scholarly
sources to
support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5
(8.5%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8
(8%)
* response has
some depth
and may
exhibit critical
thinking or
application to
practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7
(7%)
* response is
on topic, may
have some
depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* response
may not be on
topic, lacks
depth
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 4/4
Outstanding
Performance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Procient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
Second
Reponse:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
fully answered
if posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
eectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
answered if
posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
eectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
*
Communication
is mostly
professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
mostly
answered if
posed *
Provides
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
few credible
sources *
Response is
written in
Standard
Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack eective
professional
communication
* Response to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered if
posed * Few or
no credible
sources are
cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion
lack eective
* Response to
faculty
questions are
missing * No
credible
sources are
cited
Second
Reponse:
Timely and
full
participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts by due
date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation
Total Points: 100
Name:NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric
EXIT
