DNP Roles and Responsibilities work
DNP Roles and Responsibilities Paper
Guidelines with Grading Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to prepare the DNP student to determine how the scientific underpinnings of nursing supports evidence based practice (EBP). The student will consider how to engage in advancing nursing practice and provide leadership for evidence-based practice, lead changes that promote the translation of research into practice and guide improvements in practice and outcomes of care.
Course Outcomes
In completing this assignment, the student will:
CO1: Evaluate evidence based approaches to delivery of leadership services in nursing in applicable practice settings. (PO 1, 2)
CO3: Explore methodologies to improve student and/or patient outcomes through dissemination of evidence based practice. (PO 3, 4)
CO5: Appraise evidence and apply it to policy development in the nursing leadership arena. (PO 3)
CO6: Employ communication skills and the spirit of inquiry, nursing judgment, professional identity, and collaborative skills in the development of practice models. (PO 7)
Total Points Possible: 200
REQUIREMENTS:
1. To complete this assignment, you will need to access to the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and other resources in the Jay Sexter Library. These data bases can be accessed through the Touro Online Library
http://tun.touro.edu/jay-Links to an external site.
sexter-library/Links to an external site.
2. The
DNP Roles and Responsibilities Paperis worth 200 points and will be graded using the designated rubric. Grading criteria include quality of content, appropriate citations, use of Standard English grammar, and overall organization and readability.
3. Create your assignment using a Microsoft Word. The document should be saved in a .doc or .docx format.
4. The paper should be 3 to 6 pages in length excluding title page and reference pages.
5. APA format is required.
6. The following sections should be included and denoted through APA section headings in the paper:
Introduction
Role of DNP in Appraising Evidence
Putting into Practice
Conclusion
PREPARING THE PAPER:
1. Review Hall, H. R. & Roussell, L. A. Chapter 8, 9, 12
2. As you work on your paper, consider how you can engage yourself in advanced nursing practice and provide leadership for evidence-based practice. How will you lead changes that promote the translation of research into practice? How will you guide improvements in practice and outcomes of care?
3. This assignment will be accomplished within the framework for systems change. Three topic areas are provided for your consideration as you research and write this paper. You only need to choose and focus on one topic and can be macro or micro focused related to an organization. Please refer to the grading rubric for additional details.
4.
Discuss the following:How will you lead changes that promote the translation of research into practice? How will you guide improvements in practice and outcomes of care? Provide information about the role of a DNP prepared nurse as it applies to evaluation of EBP in an organizational setting (integrate Essential III and collaboration as they apply).
5.
Put into practice:Choose
onetopic below to answer. Can be macro or micro focused related to an organization.
Option 1)Evaluate an intervention noted within the organizational setting and compare against the national benchmark. Is this intervention system wide? Is it based on sound evidence based practice? How is the outcome assessed, and how does the outcome achieved meet with the overall outcome desired?
Option 2)Establish a plan to assist bedside nurses to incorporate evidence- based practice into their daily care routines. How may the organizational culture and context in which the process takes place have an impact? How can you, as a leader, play an intrinsic role in the process of EBP implementation in practice?
6. Conclusion to your paper.
7. See rubric attached.
DNP Module 3 Rubric (Roles and Responsibilites).pdf
Download DNP Module 3 Rubric (Roles and Responsibilites).pdf
Rubric
Roles and Responsibilities (Module 3) FINAL
Roles and Responsibilities (Module 3) FINAL
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
20to >18.4pts
Exceptional
Excellent introduction of the purpose of the paper. Thesis statement with a summary of what will be explored in the paper is well developed.
18.4to >17.2pts
Proficient
Basic introduction introduction of the purpose of the paper. Thesis statement with a summary of what will be explored in the paper is fairly developed.
17.2to >16.2pts
Minimally Passing
Little or very general introduction of the purpose of the paper. Thesis statement with a summary of what will be explored in the paper is underdeveloped.
16.2to >0pts
Not Passing
No introduction of the purpose of the paper.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe DNP role appraisal of evidence
60to >55.2pts
Exceptional
Provides information about the role of a DNP prepared nurse as it applies to appraisal of evidence. References to scholarly inquiry and the text book are provided. Potential applications to current practice are evident. Discussion includes DNP Essential III and collaboration as they apply to EBP.
55.2to >51.6pts
Proficient
Provided information that was specific to the doctoral prepared nurse regarding appraisal of evidence. Some discussion of DNP Essential III and collaboration as it applies to EBP.
51.6to >48.6pts
Minimally Passing
Lacking detailed information regarding the doctoral prepared nurse role in appraisal of evidence. Missing information regarding DNP Essential III and collaboration as it applies to EBP.
48.6to >0pts
Not Passing
Did not provide information regarding the doctoral prepared nurse role in appraisal of evidence. Did not provide information regarding DNP Essential III or collaboration as it applies to EBP.
60pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePutting into Practice
60to >55.2pts
Exceptional
Chooses one topic and provides in-depth analysis details how to make changes. References to scholarly inquiry and the text book are provided. Potential applications to current practice are evident.
55.2to >51.6pts
Proficient
Provided most details on how to make changes on chosen topic. References to scholarly inquiry and the text book are provided. Potential application to current practice are evident.
51.6to >48.6pts
Minimally Passing
Lacking detailed information regarding the changes on chosen topic. Reference scholarly inquiry and the text book are minimal.
48.6to >0pts
Not Passing
Did not provide information regarding the how to make changes on chosen topic and application to practice. Reference scholarly inquiry and the text book are lacking.
60pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
20to >18.4pts
Exceptional
Provided excellent conclusion is clear and concise. The purpose of the paper is made clear. Major details are summarized with minor details left out. The most important components of the role of a DNP prepared nurse in evidence appraisal, implementation, and evaluation are summarized. Conclusion with no new evidence introduced.
18.4to >17.2pts
Proficient
Good summary of DNP role. The purpose of the paper is made clear. Most major details are summarized with minor details left out. The most important components of the role of a DNP prepared nurse in evidence appraisal, implementation, and evaluation are summarized. Includes a conclusion with no new evidence introduced.
17.2to >16.2pts
Minimally Passing
Little summary provided of DNP role. Emphasis on the wrong area is provided. Includes a conclusion with new evidence introduced.
16.2to >0pts
Not Passing
No conclusion or summary of DNP role.
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing
20to >18.4pts
Exceptional
Writing is relevant to the topic and is presented logically and clearly using standard English language. Direct course applications and synthesis of scholarly information is easily discernable. Word choice is correct, precise and unambiguous. Sentence structure is clear, concise and well- constructed. No grammatical or typographical errors.
18.4to >17.2pts
Proficient
Writing may lack some logic or clarity but is overall discernable. May also lack relevance to the topic. Four to five grammatical or typographical errors are noted.
17.2to >16.2pts
Minimally Passing
Most of writing lacks a logical and clear approach. Relevance to the topic is difficult to discern. Six or more grammatical or typographical errors are noted.
16.2to >0pts
Not Passing
All writing lack clarity and relevance to the topic. Postings contain greater than ten errors in syntax, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation (>ten errors).
20pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
20to >18.4pts
Exceptional
APA rules regarding level headings, page/paragraph format, and citations in the body of the paper adhere to APA format as well as references noted at the end of the paper (no more than one to two errors). No more than 25% of your paper should be direct quotes.
18.4to >17.2pts
Proficient
Paper over all does not adhere to APA format including in text citations, page format, level headings, as well as references noted in the reference page (four to five errors).
17.2to >16.2pts
Minimally Passing
Paper over all does not adhere to APA format including in text citations, page format, level headings, as well as references noted in the reference page (>eight errors).
16.2to >0pts
Not Passing
Paper does not adhere to APA format on multiple levels, exceeding previously stated standards.
20pts
Total Points:200
Previous
Next
