Assignment 10 Alternative PSY 07301: Statistics in Psychology Instructions: For each question, answer all items. Make sure that you are detaile

Assignment 10 Alternative

PSY 07301: Statistics in Psychology

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Assignment 10 Alternative PSY 07301: Statistics in Psychology Instructions: For each question, answer all items. Make sure that you are detaile
From as Little as $13/Page

Instructions: For each question, answer all items. Make sure that you are detailed when you answer the questions. As a rule of thumb, when you are answering any questions using statistics, you should include all statistics in the answer (e.g. if it asks about the mean, put the actual value of the mean in the sentence).
Type your answers out underneath each question either bolded or in a different font color (or both). Please do not delete the questions or the output. When you are finished with the assignment, upload it as a .doc, .docx, or .pdf to the assignment on Canvas.

The analyses come from the high school exam data set. This data set includes information about how students in NY State performed on a bunch of standardized tests. In addition to the test scores, there is demographic information (ethnicity/race, gender) and school information (type of school, type of program). The analyses below use a variety of tests that look at the relationships between variables.

Note: There are 5 parts to this assignment each one on a separate page. Make sure to answer all parts.

Part I: One-Way ANOVA
This analysis is looking at the relationship between ethnicity/race and freshman year science scores. Use the tables and graph included below to answer the following questions:
1. What are the null and alternative hypotheses for this analysis?
2. In a few sentences, describe the descriptive data for each ethnicity/race group (include N, mean, standard deviation, minimum, & maximum).
3. Did we violate the assumption of homogeneity in this analysis? Include evidence for your answer (i.e. how do you know?).
4. Were there significant differences in science scores between the different ethnicities?
5. Based on the results of your analysis, should you analyze the post hoc tests?
a. If yes, which groups are significantly different from each other? (List all).
b. Explain what the post hoc tests tell us about the relationship between ethnicity and science scores.
6. Complete Step 4 of hypothesis testing. Include your decision about the null hypothesis, a sentence describing the results (including post hoc tests), and the APA-style string of statistics.
7.

In your own words
, what is the relationship between ethnicity and science scores?

Descriptives

freshman yr science score

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

hispanic

24

45.3750

8.21881

1.67766

41.9045

48.8455

26.00

63.00

asian

11

51.4545

9.49067

2.86154

45.0786

57.8305

34.00

66.00

african-amer

20

42.8000

9.44569

2.11212

38.3793

47.2207

29.00

61.00

white

145

54.2000

9.09487

.75529

52.7071

55.6929

33.00

74.00

Total

200

51.8500

9.90089

.70010

50.4694

53.2306

26.00

74.00

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

freshman yr science score

Levene Statistic

df1

df2

Sig.

.565

3

196

.639

ANOVA

freshman yr science score

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Between Groups

3446.748

3

1148.916

14.021

.000

Within Groups

16060.752

196

81.943

Total

19507.500

199

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

Dependent Variable: freshman yr science score

LSD

(I) Ethinicy/Race

(J) Ethinicy/Race

Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

hispanic

asian

-6.07955

3.29600

.067

-12.5797

.4206

african-amer

2.57500

2.74069

.349

-2.8300

7.9800

white

-8.82500*

1.99484

.000

-12.7591

-4.8909

asian

hispanic

6.07955

3.29600

.067

-.4206

12.5797

african-amer

8.65455*

3.39801

.012

1.9532

15.3559

white

-2.74545

2.83098

.333

-8.3285

2.8376

african-amer

hispanic

-2.57500

2.74069

.349

-7.9800

2.8300

asian

-8.65455*

3.39801

.012

-15.3559

-1.9532

white

-11.40000*

2.15922

.000

-15.6583

-7.1417

white

hispanic

8.82500*

1.99484

.000

4.8909

12.7591

asian

2.74545

2.83098

.333

-2.8376

8.3285

african-amer

11.40000*

2.15922

.000

7.1417

15.6583

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

8.

Part II: Correlation
Using the output below (investigating the relationship between different exam scores), describe all 3 different pairs of relationships (reading-writing; reading-math; math-writing). For each, make sure to include the following information:
Whether the relationship was significant.
If it was significant, whether it was a positive/negative relationship.
Describe the relationships (As X increases/decreases, Y increases/decreases).
APA string of statistics [
r=
r value,
p=______]

You can do this in bullet format, but make sure to use whole sentences.

Correlations

Correlations

reading score

writing score

math score

reading score

Pearson Correlation

1

.597**

.658**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

N

200

200

200

writing score

Pearson Correlation

.597**

1

.056

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.190

N

200

200

200

math score

Pearson Correlation

.658**

.056

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.190

N

200

200

200

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Looking at the scatterplot below, describe the relationship between math scores (X) and social studies scores (Y). Make sure to describe the
strength and direction of the relationship. You do not need to include an APA string of statistics for this question.

Part III: Regression
The output below is the result of investigating the predictive relationship between freshman year science scores and senior year science scores. Researchers wanted to see if they can predict senior year science scores from each students freshman year scores. Answer the following questions using the output below:

What is the correlation coefficient (r) for the relationship between senior and freshman year scores?
Does freshman year science scores significantly predict senior year science scores?
Write out the F statistical string associated with this relationship. [F(
dfreg, dfres)=
F value, p=________]

Write out the line of best fit equation for this relationship (Y=bX+a, substituting the b & a with values from the table).
If someone scored a 70 on their freshman year science test, based on the line of best fit, what would their predicted senior year score be?

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.878a

.771

.770

5.80149

a. Predictors: (Constant), freshman yr science score

ANOVAa

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

22478.445

1

22478.445

667.862

.000b

Residual

6664.150

198

33.657

Total

29142.595

199

a. Dependent Variable: senior yr science score

b. Predictors: (Constant), freshman yr science score

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

-2.613

2.192

-1.192

.235

freshman yr science score

1.073

.042

.878

25.843

.000

a. Dependent Variable: senior yr science score

Part IV: Chi Square Goodness of Fit Test
For this study, participants were split into 3 groups based on the type of exercise they engage in (martial arts, general exercise, or no exercise). I wanted to see if there were more people who do one type of exercise compared to the others. To do so, I ran a chi square goodness of fit test to determine whether there was a different number of participants in the groups. Answer the following questions using the output below:

How many people did I sample total?
Which of the exercise groups had more than the expected N?
Which of the exercise groups had less than the expected N?
Was there a significant difference in the number of participants in each group? How do you know?
Write out the statistical string of information for this test. It should be formatted like this: 2(df, N=##)= Chi-square value,
p=###

a. Make sure that you put the actual number in for the df, the chi-square value, and the ## after N and p
In your own words, what do the results of this test tell you about the distribution of participants in these exercise groups?

Part V: Chi Square Test of Independence
For this study, participants were split into 3 groups based on the type of exercise they engage in (martial arts, general exercise, or no exercise). I wanted to see if there was a difference in the proportion of male and female participants in the different exercise types. To do so, I ran a chi square test of independence to determine whether there was a significant relationship between the variables. Answer the following questions using the output below:

How many people did I sample total?
Which of the exercise groups had the same amount of male and female participants?
Which gender had higher numbers in general exercise?
Which gender had higher numbers in the no exercise group?
Which exercise group had the highest number of people total in it?
Was there a significant relationship between exercise type and gender? How do you know?
Write out the statistical string of information for this test. It should be formatted like this: 2(df, N=##)= Chi-square value,
p=###

a. Make sure that you put the actual number in for the df, the chi-square value, and the ## after N and p
In your own words, what do the results of this test tell you about these 2 variables?

image4.png

image1.png

image2.png

image3.png

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *