Annotated Bibliography over South Korea’s National Flower (Mungunghwa)
Assignment 1: The Annotated Bibliography
Objective: Assess sources for your research for your final presentation (for credibility, reliability, and relevance) and list references in proper APA format. That means the sources you use for this assignment should be directly related to the species that you chose in Forum 1 of the class.
Assignment Instructions: The Research Project/Presentation for this class is divided into three major Assignments, 1) annotated bibliography, 2) outline and 3) final presentation. The first part is the annotated bibliography. An annotation is a summary and evaluation, and your annotated bibliography will include a summary and evaluation of some of the sources (or references) you will use for your presentation.
To prepare for this assignment, I recommend that you do the following:
Read these directions carefully.
Review the sample annotated bibliographyprovided to you below.
Read the grading criteria below. The grading criteria is a detailed evaluation that I will use to assess your performance. It will also help you understand what is expected of you as you prepare your assignment.
Message me with any questions!
The reason the annotated bibliography is included as part of the research project is that writing an annotated bibliography is important in that it provides excellent preparation for the final presentation. One of the issues regarding any type of research, especially in biology, is the credibility of the sources used, particularly those obtained from various websites. By forcing you to evaluate each of your potential sources carefully, the annotated bibliography helps you determine if in fact the source you chose is credible and helps you determine how relevant it is to your topic and understand the topic better which will help you develop your presentation.
For this project, you will assess three sources to include:
1) a complete citation for each source,
2) a summary of each source, and
3) an evaluation of each source.
Three sources are required for this assignment (i.e., you are to write an annotation for each source). However, you must use five or more sources in your final presentation.
Use this TEMPLATE to summarize and evaluate each of your three sources. <------ REQUIRED
Citation:
Written in APA reference list format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
Summary:
What is the purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This section is generally 4-6 sentences that summarize the author's main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
Evaluation:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book), it is necessary to evaluate it and state where you found it its source (e.g., journal, website, etc.). Briefly answer the following questions in 4-6 sentences:
What is the format or type of source (e.g., peer-reviewed journal paper, website, book)? How reliable is the information in the article, and how credible is the source (e.g., website's sponsoring organization, journal or book publisher) and the author(s)?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
Additional Resources:
Sample Annotated Bibliography
Also, please see the resources below at The Owl at Purdue site for more information on how to write an annotated bibliography as well as other pages on the site to assist you with the other parts of the research paper:
Annotated Bibliographies
Annotated Bibliography Example
Annotated Bibliography Samples
Evaluation: Please review the Annotated Bibliography Grading Criteriathat describes how your annotated bibliography will be graded.
Submission Instructions:
You must submit your Annotated Bibliography as a "Microsoft Word" document using the template provided (rather than a Word Pad, Works, etc. document) AND title your file name as FirstnameLastname_SCIN130_Assg1.doc. Otherwise, you will not receive credit for your assignment.
Upload your assignment for grading by clicking on the "Add Attachment" button at the bottom of the page.
The new screen will prompt you to click the "Browse" button so you can locate the MS Word document of your Annotated Bibliography on your computer.
Find the file and double-click on it.
Click "Continue".
Double check to ensure that your annotated bibliography was successfully uploaded as an attachment.
When you have completed this assignment, type "Completed" in the rich text editor box below.
Check the "Honor Pledge: I have neither given nor received aid on this assignment." checkbox.
Click the "Submit" button.
Your annotated bibliography is automatically submitted to Turnitin with your submission:
Papers will be automatically added to and checked against the standard Turnitin repositories. Originality reports will be returned to the faculty and student in roughly 15 minutes of the submission. Multiple submissions are allowed before the due date. If you wish to learn more about and how to access Turnitin.com, a plagiarism detection website, these are available from the APUS Online Library. APUS Writing Center.
SCIN130 - Introduction to Biology with Lab
Annotated Bibliography
Name:
Course Number:
Presentation Topic:
Source #1
Citation
(in APA format)
Summary
Evaluation
Source #2
Citation
(in APA format)
Summary
Evaluation
Source #3
Citation
(in APA format)
Summary
Evaluation
American Public University System May 2018 SCIN130 - Introduction to Biology with Lab
American Public University System May 2018
Annotated Bibliography Grading Criteria
Three sources must be evaluated, each based on the following criteria:
Source selection and credibility (12 points)
Sources are from journals, books, or websites and based on current and credible
scientific work either directly or indirectly
Sources such as wikis or blogs are not utilized
APA formatting of source (12 points)
Source citations are written in APA reference list format
Summary of source (32 points) approximately 4-6 sentences
Topic sentence included stating the main topic of the source
Explains whether source is original research or a review of the topic
States main conclusions or findings
Evaluation of source (32 points) approximately 4-6 sentences
States source format/type (e.g., peer-reviewed journal paper, website, book)
Provides evidence of authors authority
Evaluates source (e.g., websites sponsoring organization, journal or book publisher)
Writing expectations and scientific terminology (12 points)
Summaries and evaluations accurately apply scientific concepts and use scientific
terminology correctly
Proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation are used throughout Sample Annotated Bibliography Entry:
M. Wilson, R. O'Hanlon, S. Prasad, A. Deighan, P. MacMillan, D. Oxborough,
R. Godfrey, G. work either Smith, A. Maceira, S. Sharma, K. George, G.
Whyte. (2011). Diverse patterns of myocardial fibrosis in lifelong, veteran
endurance athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology, 110 (6), 1622-1626 DOI:
10.1152/japplphysiol.01280.2010
The authors of this original study reported on morphological characteristics of
the hearts, evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), of twelve life-
long endurance athletes between the ages of 50 and 67 and compared their
observations with 20 non-endurance athletes ages 52-69 and with seventeen
younger endurance athletes between 26 and 40 years of age. They
hypothesized that life-long veteran endurance athletes develop structural
changes to their hearts that may have adverse effects and place them at
higher risk for cardiac events. Their findings supported this hypothesis in that
significant differences were observed in the images obtained between the
three groups.
The Journal of Applied Physiology is published by the American Physiological
Society and is considered a leading publication in the field of physiology
research. The lead author is Dr. Mathew G. Wilson, Department of Sports
Medicine, ASPETAR, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha,
Qatar. Dr. Wilson has extensive experience testing athletes and over 60
publications. Dr. Wilson is also a high-level endurance athlete himself
providing him with direct experience and deeper insight into this issue. There
are no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the
author(s).
Below is an example of another source used for the paper for
comparison (annotation not included):
Benito, B. et.al.. (2011) Cardiac Arrhythmogenic Remodeling in a Rat Model
of Long-Term Intensive Exercise Training. Circulation 123, 13-22.
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.1 10.938282
Sources are from journals, books, or websites and
based on current and credible scientific work directly
or indirectly and are written in APA reference list
format.
The summary is
approximately 4-6
sentences including a
topic sentence stating
the main topic of the
source, whether the
source is original
research or a review of
the topic, and states
main conclusions.
The evaluation is
approximately 4-6
sentences that states the
sources type/format (e.g.,
peer-reviewed journal
paper, website, book),
provides evidence of the
authors authority, and
evaluates other criteria of
the source (e.g., websites
sponsoring organization,
journal or book publisher).
Use proper
scientific
terminology and
be sure to
proofread for
writing errors. THE MUGUNGHWA
By: Bryan Cridell
Date: 09 Sep 2020
Class: SCIN130
Instructor: Elizabeth Kraske
THE MUGUNGHWA
Major kingdom: Plant
Common name: Rose of Sharon
Scientific name: Hibiscus syriacus
Residency: Native to China, India, & Korea
WHY DID I
CHOOSE THIS?
I chose this organism because it is the
Nation flower of South Korea where I'm
currently stationed. I figure this is a great
way to learn more about the culture.
https://www.mcst.go.kr/english/koreaInfo/aboutKor
ea/symbols.jsp
