533 paper
BASED ON READINGS & RUBRIC-
Table 1 in “Principles and Practices of Sociocultural Assessment: Foundations for Effective Strategies for Linguistically Diverse Classrooms” describes Concepts, Principles, and Checklist Items that can be used to evaluate assessments. Select two of the Checklist Items you think are extremely important when evaluating assessments for ELL students.
In a 500-750 word essay, describe those items, and defend why you believe they are of particular importance.
Support this assignment with at least three scholarly resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Readings-
http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2016/making-content-comprehensible-for-english-learners_the-siop-model_ebook_5e.php
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=12795771&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3496986&site=eds-live&scope=site
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Williams-Feedback.html
http://www.colorincolorado.org/educators/assessment/informal/
http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/40715/
https://pdo.ascd.org/lmscourses/PD13OC002/media/ELL_CC_M4_Reading_Using_Formative01.pdf
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ESL-533 ESL-533-O502 Evaluating and Selecting Assessments 65.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Category 100.0%
Summary of Article: Analyzes items from the assigned article. Presents them with brief summary to provide context for the reader. 25.0% Not addressed. Summary fails to paint a clear picture of the article, omits major elements, and is disorganized. Summarizes the primary elements and key points of the article; however, summary is cursory and lacks depth. Summary of the article is clearly evident to the reader. Themes and details are present and easily identified. Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail.
Analysis: Two items from article adequately described and the importance of each justified. 35.0% Not addressed. An analysis of one or both of the items presented without specific details direction or emphasis. Project presents weak, marginal evidence and/or exhibits large gaps in the presentation of evidence, resulting from inconsistent connections with the argument. An analysis of both of the items is broadly listed, but not specifically or in detail. Evidence, such as textual sources, personal experience, and observation is appropriate to the audience and rhetorical situation. The evidence fulfills the minimum in terms of quantity and quality that is acceptable to support the argument. An analysis of both of the items is outlined. A diversity of evidence is present. The evidence extends beyond what is needed to support the argument effectively. An analysis of both of the items is described in detail and in depth. Presents a compelling argument for inclusion of the resource in the project. The type, quantity, and/or quality of evidence resonate with the claims, argument, and structure of the paper. Irrefutable evidence from theoretical, academic, and practical sources is convincingly presented.
Topic Knowledge 10.0% Not addressed. Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
Content Cohesiveness 10.0% Not addressed. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. The essay is generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The presentation gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Conclusion 5.0% Not addressed. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but it is vague or poorly developed. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but is cursory and lacking depth. Summary of the paper is evident to the reader. Arguments presented follow logical progression and support claims. Summary of paper is clearly evident to the reader. Arguments support all claims with clarity, order, and richness of detail.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized. Prose is completely free of mechanical errors. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized. Writing is engaging and practice related language is utilized.
APA Format and Style Requirements 5.0% Not addressed. References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used. References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.
Total Weightage 100%
