4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db

4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=312742&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=89375 1/1

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db
From as Little as $13/Page

Add a File Record Audio Record Video

MidTerm Assignment

Hide Assignment Informaon

Turnitin

This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.

Instructions

Due Date

May 7, 2023 11:59 PM

Show Rubrics

Submit Assignment

Files to submit

(0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.

Comments

SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 LE

Assignments MidTerm Assignment

Weeks 3, 4, & 5:

This assignment is due at the end of week 5. Business Continuity Planning is another
tool used to measure and understand an organization’s supply chain risk. Review the
Business Continuity Planning Assessment Questionnaire in Appendix A of the Kildow
text. Consider your organization’s business continuity plan, if any, and evaluate the
organization using the Kildow template in Appendix A. You may choose an organization
other than the one where you are working or have worked. You may average the scores
obtained from the categories to provide a 500-word overview on your assessment. If
your organization is not conducive to a business continuity assessment, you may select
any organization which you are either familiar with or can conduct research.

Submit Cancel

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/89375

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folders_list.d2l?ou=89375 4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=312742&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=89375 1/4

Add a File Record Audio Record Video

MidTerm Assignment

Hide Assignment Informaon

Turnitin

This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.

Instructions

Due Date

May 7, 2023 11:59 PM

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: SCMG201/301 Assignment Rubric

Submit Assignment

Files to submit

(0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.

SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 LE

Assignments MidTerm Assignment

Weeks 3, 4, & 5:

This assignment is due at the end of week 5. Business Continuity Planning is another
tool used to measure and understand an organization’s supply chain risk. Review the
Business Continuity Planning Assessment Questionnaire in Appendix A of the Kildow
text. Consider your organization’s business continuity plan, if any, and evaluate the
organization using the Kildow template in Appendix A. You may choose an organization
other than the one where you are working or have worked. You may average the scores
obtained from the categories to provide a 500-word overview on your assessment. If
your organization is not conducive to a business continuity assessment, you may select
any organization which you are either familiar with or can conduct research.

Print

SCMG201/301 Assignment Rubric
Course: SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Focus/The

sis

/ 2525 points

Student

exhibits a

defined and

clear

understandin

g of

the

assignment.

Thesis is

clearly

defined and

well

constructed

to help guide

the reader

throughout

the

assignment.

Student

builds upon

the thesis of

the

assignment

with well-

documented

and

exceptional

supporting

facts,

figures,

and/or

statements.

21.25 points

Establishes a

good

comprehensi

on of topic

and in the

building of

the thesis.

Student

demonstrate

s an

effective

presentation

of thesis,

with

most

support

statements

helping to

support the

key focus of

assignment.

18.75 points

Student

exhibits a

basic

understandin

g of the

assignment,

but thesis

not fully

supported

throughout.

While thesis

helps to

guide the

development

of the

assignment,

the reader

has some

difficulty in

seeing

linkages.

While

student has

included a

few

supporting

facts and

statements,

this has

limited the

quality of

the

assignment.

16.25 points

Exhibits a

limited

understandin

g of the

assignment.

Reader is

unable to

follow the

logic used

for the thesis

and

development

of key

themes.

Introduction

of thesis is

not clearly

evident, and

reader must

look deeper

to discover

the focus of

the writer.

Students

writing is

weak in the

inclusion of

supporting

facts or

statements.

0 points

Did not

attempt.

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/89375

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folders_list.d2l?ou=89375

4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=312742&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=89375 2/4

CommentsCriteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Content/S

ubject

Knowledg

e

/ 2525 points

Student

demonstrate

s proficient

command of

the

subject

matter in the

assignment.

Assignment

shows an

impressive

level of

depth of

students

ability to

relate course

content to

practical

examples

and

applications.

Student

provides

comprehensi

ve analysis

of details,

facts, and

concepts in a

logical

sequence.

21.25 points

Student

exhibits

above

average

usage of

subject

matter in

assignment.

Student

provides

above

average

ability in

relating

course

content in

examples

given.

Details and

facts

presented

provide an

adequate

presentation

of students

current level

of subject

matter

knowledge.

18.75 points

The

assignment

reveals that

the student

has a

general,

fundamental

understandin

g of the

course

material.

Whereas,

there are

areas of

some

concerning

in the

linkages

provided

between

facts

and

supporting

statements.

Student

generally

explains

concepts,

but only

meets

the minimum

requirements

in this area.

16.25 points

Student tries

to explain

some

concepts,

but

overlooks

critical

details.

Assignment

appears

vague or

incomplete

in various

segments.

Student

presents

concepts in

isolation,

and does not

perceive to

have a

logical

sequencing

of ideas.

0 points

Did not

attempt.

Submit Cancel

4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=312742&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=89375 3/4

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Critical

Thinking

Skills

/ 2525 points

Student

demonstrate

s a higher-

level of

critical

thinking

necessary

for 300-

400 level

work.

Learner

provides a

strategic

approach in

presenting

examples of

problem

solving or

critical

thinking,

while

drawing

logical

conclusions

which are

not

immediately

obvious.

Student

provides

well-

supported

ideas and

reflection

with a

variety of

current

and/or world

views in the

assignment.

Student

presents a

genuine

intellectual

development

of ideas

throughout

assignment.

21.25 points

Student

exhibits a

good

command of

critical

thinking

skills in the

presentation

of material

and

supporting

statements.

Assignment

demonstrate

s the

students

above

average use

of relating

concepts by

using a

variety of

factors.

Overall,

student

provides

adequate

conclusions,

with 2 or

fewer errors.

18.75 points

Student

takes a

common,

conventional

approach in

guiding the

reader

through

various

linkages and

connections

presented in

assignment.

However,

student

presents a

limited

perspective

on key

concepts

throughout

assignment.

Student

appears to

have

problems

applying

information

in a

problem-

solving

manner.

16.25 points

Student

demonstrate

s beginning

understandin

g

of key

concepts,

but

overlooks

critical

details.

Learner is

unable to

apply

information

in a

problem-

solving

fashion.

Student

presents

confusing

statements

and facts in

assignment.

No evidence

or little

semblance of

critical

thinking

skills.

0 points

Did not

attempt.

4/30/23, 2:38 PM MidTerm Assignment – SCMG301 B001 Spring 2023 – APEI

https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=312742&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=89375 4/4

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Organizati

on of Ideas

/ 2525 points

Student

thoroughly

understands

and excels in

explaining all

major points.

An original,

unique,

and/or

imaginative

approach to

overall ideas,

concepts,

and findings

is presented.

Overall

format of

assignment

includes an

appropriate

introduction

(or abstract),

well-

developed

paragraphs,

and

conclusion.

Finished

assignment

demonstrate

s students

ability to

plan and

organize

research in a

logical

sequence.

21.25 points

Student

explains the

majority of

points and

concepts in

the

assignment.

Learner

demonstrate

s a good skill

level in

formatting

and

organizing

material in

assignment.

Student

presents an

above

average level

of

preparednes

s, with a few

formatting

errors.

18.75 points

Learner

applies some

points and

concepts

incorrectly.

Student uses

a variety of

formatting

styles, with

some

inconsistenci

es

throughout

the paper.

Assignment

does not

have a

continuous

pattern of

logical

sequencing.

16.25 points

Assignment

reveals

formatting

errors and a

lack of

organization.

Student

presents an

incomplete

attempt to

provide

linkages or

explanation

of key terms.

The lack of

appropriate

references or

source

materials

demonstrate

s the

students

need for

additional

help or

training in

this area.

Student

needs to

review and

revise the

assignment.

0 points

Did not

attempt.

Exemplary
90 points minimum

Accomplished
80 points minimum

Developing
70 points minimum

Beginning
60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt
0 points minimum 4/30/23, 3:03 PM SCRR Analytics

https://www.90days.thescrmconsortium.com/SCRR?id=306 1/1

Supply Chain Management Readiness Assessment (V2X)
Sector: Government

Revanue: $1-$4.9 billion
Employees Number: Government

Countries Number: 5
13 Service tenants

On Your Way
Getting Started
Exemplars
Your Organisation

0

2

4

6

8

Highcharts.com

Leadership
Balanced
Scorecard

Intentional
Redundancies

Demand
Management

Industry

Info Systems

Integrated
Supply Chain

Risk
Mitigation
Planning

Supply

S&OP
Processes

Supply
Chain
Processes

Logistics

Agility

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *